From: Support <support@ggsys.net>
To: Mike Accetta <maccetta@laurelnetworks.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Software RAID when it works and when it doesn't
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:53:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192658032.16416.407.camel@w100> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14526.1192571833@mdt.ecitele.com>
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 17:57 -0400, Mike Accetta wrote:
> Was the disk driver generating any low level errors or otherwise
> indicating that it might be retrying operations on the bad drive at
> the time (i.e. console diagnostics)? As Neil mentioned later, the md layer
> is at the mercy of the low level disk driver. We've observed abysmal
> RAID1 recovery times on failing SATA disks because all the time is
> being spent in the driver retrying operations which will never succeed.
> Also, read errors don't tend to fail the array so when the bad disk is
> again accessed for some subsequent read the whole hopeless retry process
> begins anew.
The console was full of errors like:
end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 42644555
I don't know what generates those messages.
As I asked before but never got an answer, is there a way to do timeouts
within the md code so that we are not at the mercy of the lower layer
drivers?
>
> I posted a patch about 6 weeks ago which attempts to improve this situation
> for RAID1 by telling the driver not to retry on failures and giving some
> weight to read errors for failing the array. Hopefully, Neil is still
> mulling it over and it or something similar will eventually make it into
> the main line kernel as a solution for this problem.
> --
> Mike Accetta
>
Thanks,
Alberto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-17 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-13 18:40 Software RAID when it works and when it doesn't Alberto Alonso
2007-10-13 22:46 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2007-10-13 22:50 ` Neil Brown
2007-10-14 5:57 ` Alberto Alonso
2007-10-16 21:57 ` Mike Accetta
2007-10-16 22:29 ` Richard Scobie
2007-10-17 21:53 ` Support [this message]
2007-10-18 15:26 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2007-10-19 7:07 ` Alberto Alonso
2007-10-19 15:02 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-20 13:45 ` Michael Tokarev
2007-10-20 13:55 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-26 16:11 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2007-10-26 16:11 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-23 22:45 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-24 5:50 ` Alberto Alonso
2007-10-24 20:04 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-24 20:18 ` Alberto Alonso
2007-10-26 16:12 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2007-10-26 17:09 ` Alberto Alonso
2007-10-27 15:26 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-11-02 8:47 ` Alberto Alonso
[not found] ` <471241F8.50205@harddata.com>
2007-10-14 18:22 ` Alberto Alonso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1192658032.16416.407.camel@w100 \
--to=support@ggsys.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maccetta@laurelnetworks.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).