linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "BERTRAND Joël" <joel.bertrand@systella.fr>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Raid5 trouble
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:51:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192809103.30976.11.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471864F8.9010209@systella.fr>

On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 01:04 -0700, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
>         I never see any oops with this patch. But I cannot create a
> RAID1 array
> with a local RAID5 volume and a foreign RAID5 array exported by iSCSI.
> iSCSI seems to works fine, but RAID1 creation randomly aborts due to a
> unknown SCSI task on target side.

For now I am going to forward this patch to Neil for inclusion in
-stable and 2.6.24-rc.  I will add a "Tested-by: Joël Bertrand
<joel.bertrand@systella.fr>" unless you have an objection.

>         I have stressed iSCSI target with some simultaneous I/O
> without any
> trouble (nullio, fileio and blockio), thus I suspect another bug in
> raid
> code (or an arch specific bug). The last two days, I have made some
> tests to isolate and reproduce this bug:
> 1/ iSCSI target and initiator seem work when I export with iSCSI a
> raid5
> array;
> 2/ raid1 and raid5 seem work with local disks;
> 3/ iSCSI target is disconnected only when I create a raid1 volume over
> iSCSI (blockio _and_ fileio) with following message:
> 
> Oct 18 10:43:52 poulenc kernel: iscsi_trgt: cmnd_abort(1156) 29 1 0 42
> 57344 0 0
> Oct 18 10:43:52 poulenc kernel: iscsi_trgt: Abort Task (01) issued on
> tid:1 lun:0 by sid:630024457682948 (Unknown Task)
> 
>         I run for 12 hours some dd's (read and write in nullio)
> between
> initiator and target without any disconnection. Thus iSCSI code seems
> to
> be robust. Both initiator and target are alone on a single gigabit
> ethernet link (without any switch). I'm investigating...

Can you reproduce on 2.6.22?

Also, I do not think this is the cause of your failure, but you have
CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE=y in your config.  Setting this to 'n' will compile
out the unneeded checks for offload engines in async_memcpy and
async_xor.
> 
>         Regards,
>         JKB

Regards,
Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-19 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-16 13:24 [BUG] Raid5 trouble BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-17 14:32 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-17 14:58   ` Dan Williams
2007-10-17 15:40     ` Dan Williams
2007-10-17 16:44       ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-18  0:46         ` Dan Williams
2007-10-18  8:29           ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19  2:55       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-19  8:04         ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 15:51           ` Dan Williams [this message]
2007-10-19 16:03             ` BERTRAND Joël
     [not found]             ` <4718DE66.8000905@tmr.com>
2007-10-19 20:42               ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 20:49                 ` [BUG] Raid1/5 over iSCSI trouble BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 21:02                   ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " Ross S. W. Walker
2007-10-19 21:06                     ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 21:10                       ` Ross S. W. Walker
2007-10-20  7:45                         ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 21:11                       ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " Scott Kaelin
2007-10-19 21:04                   ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 21:08                     ` Ross S. W. Walker
2007-10-19 21:12                     ` Dan Williams
2007-10-20  8:05                       ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-24  7:12                         ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-24 20:10                           ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-24 23:49                           ` Dan Williams
2007-10-25  0:03                             ` David Miller
2007-10-27 13:29                             ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-27 18:27                               ` Dan Williams
2007-10-27 19:35                                 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-27 21:13                               ` Ming Zhang
2007-10-29 10:40                                 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 21:19                     ` Ming Zhang
2007-10-19 23:50                     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-19 23:58                       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-20  7:52                       ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-17 16:07     ` [BUG] Raid5 trouble BERTRAND Joël

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1192809103.30976.11.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=joel.bertrand@systella.fr \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).