From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alberto Alonso <alberto@ggsys.net>
Subject: Re: Implementing low level timeouts within MD
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:47:01 -0500
Message-ID: <1194025621.11827.3.camel@w100>
References: <1193418753.4771.17.camel@w100>
	 <1193425254.10336.290.camel@firewall.xsintricity.com>
	 <87tzoc7soa.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net>  <1193721577.3876.12.camel@w100>
	 <1193765984.10336.519.camel@firewall.xsintricity.com>
	 <1193893689.3649.19.camel@w100>
	 <1193944573.10336.684.camel@firewall.xsintricity.com>
	 <1193992909.3649.75.camel@w100>  <472B0552.2010608@dgreaves.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <472B0552.2010608@dgreaves.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 11:09 +0000, David Greaves wrote:

> David
> PS I can't really contribute to your list - I'm only using cheap desktop hardware.
> -

If you had failures and it properly handled them, then you can 
contribute to the good combinations, so far that's the list
that is kind of empty :-(

Thanks,

Alberto