From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
To: David Lethe <david@santools.com>
Cc: alex14641@yahoo.com, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 04:42:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1209696179.16523.13.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A20315AE59B5C34585629E258D76A97C335477@34093-C3-EVS3.exchange.rackspace.com>
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 21:31 -0500, David Lethe wrote:
> In a perfect world, my expectation is that sharing a disk is safe and
> even a reasonable thing to do. The shared disk is effectively a range of
> addressable blocks in the same way an individual disk or even a hardware
> RAID LUN is a range of blocks. From this limited perspective, the only
> penalty is performance related, assuming you don't mind having to
> explain yourself to an IT supervisor somewhere in your company.
>
> However, consider what COULD happen in event of a drive failure, either
> with the shared or an unshared disk. What are the odds all of the
> failure scenarios have been tested for all ATA and SCSI command sets;
> with threaded I/Os pending; with dirty cache; bus resets when hardware
> dies; etc... ?
>
> The odds are zero. Look how many problems people post to the thread on
> a weekly basis where people lose their data when md rebuilds go bad with
> non-shared disks. Why make the problem worse?
What? are you saying linux md is unreliable?! in other words, would i be
safer to run rsync every day to my other disk, and run in non-raid
mode?!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alex Davis
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 8:52 PM
> To: Justin Piszcz; Kasper Sandberg
> Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs
>
> --- On Thu, 5/1/08, Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk> wrote:
>
> > From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
> > Subject: Re: Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs
> > To: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
> > Cc: "Alex Davis" <alex14641@yahoo.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Date: Thursday, May 1, 2008, 9:39 PM
> > On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 08:50 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 1 May 2008, Alex Davis wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is this a bad thing? I'm guessing that it is,
> > but I want independent
> > > > confirmation before I spoke to someone I know
> > who's doing this.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> > > > Be a better friend, newshound, and
> > > > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> > "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> > > > the body of a message to
> > majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > > More majordomo info at
> > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > >
> > >
> > > What is the use case, why would you want to do that?
> > > I have seen people on the list do it before, for
> > example are you going to
> > > be utilizing both raids at the same time? If so, I
> > would advise against
> > > it.
> > >
> > > What is the reasoning?
> >
> > I do this!
> >
> > is this really bad? i would surely like a list of reasons
> > why..
> >
> > I do it because.. well.. first off, it allows me to have
> > /boot on
> > different raidlevel than / or /home without extra disks.
> > secondly, it allows me to with the same disks use different
> > filesystems.. for instance, it allows me to have /home
> > encrypted with
> > dm-crypt, while still raided.. Not that i would mind
> > encrypting /
> > and /home as 1 partition, but it creates a whole slew of
> > issues with
> > having to create initrd and stuff..
> >
> > I realize that performance probably suffers abit from this,
> > but well..
> > is there any stability or security wise risk? i mostly use
> > raid1 and
> > raid5 only..
> >
> I would guess if the RAIDs are heavily used simultaneously it could
> cause the disk head actuators to jump around more, causing more wear
> and tear.
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-02 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-01 11:35 Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs Alex Davis
2008-05-01 12:50 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-05-01 13:42 ` Alex Davis
2008-05-02 21:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-05-02 1:39 ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02 1:51 ` Alex Davis
2008-05-02 2:31 ` David Lethe
2008-05-02 2:42 ` Kasper Sandberg [this message]
2008-05-02 7:06 ` David Rees
2008-05-02 8:09 ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02 8:25 ` David Greaves
2008-05-02 21:43 ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02 22:04 ` Alex Davis
2008-05-02 22:24 ` David Lethe
2008-05-03 0:44 ` Alex Davis
2008-05-03 10:13 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-05-03 3:11 ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02 10:25 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
[not found] ` <481E0726.1030501@harddata.com>
[not found] ` <20080504212927.GB20650@rap.rap.dk>
[not found] ` <481E3374.4070105@harddata.com>
2008-05-04 23:10 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-05-04 23:17 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-05-02 13:43 ` Helge Hafting
2008-05-02 14:13 ` Alex Davis
2008-05-01 12:51 ` David Greaves
2008-05-02 1:23 ` Nick Andrew
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-02 8:36 George Spelvin
2008-05-02 11:07 ` Alex Davis
2008-05-02 13:26 ` Richard Michael
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1209696179.16523.13.camel@localhost \
--to=lkml@metanurb.dk \
--cc=alex14641@yahoo.com \
--cc=david@santools.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).