From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Redeeman Subject: Re: time limited error recovery and md raid Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:09:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1228514942.16555.95.camel@localhost> References: <1228510646.16555.73.camel@localhost> <1228511266.16555.81.camel@localhost> <1228511880.16555.87.camel@localhost> <1228512684.16555.91.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Justin Piszcz Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 16:42 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Redeeman wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 16:21 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Redeeman wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 16:12 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Redeeman wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 16:01 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Redeeman wrote: > >>>>>> > > Okay, you happen to have any knowledge to pass on about current 1tb > > disks? > I am still looking for some good 1TiB drives myself. I know one user who > has 12 of these, 11 in a RAID-5 array and 1 as a spare on a 12-port 3ware > PCI-X card: > SAMSUNG Spinpoint F1 HD103UJ 1TB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive I guess those look pretty good. i personally am running WD RE2 and Seagate ES.2 in raids without issues at all, raid1, but hmm.. > > I really would like to find a disk with a working NCQ implementation in > Linux and 3ware and one that works well. In a single disk configuration, > the WD 750G that I have used for ~1 year+ now has been fine, the problem > is finding good, reliable disks when used in a raid configuration, that is > when everything changes. > > > sorry to ask so much, but by "this process", do you mean the drive > > internally doing it rewriting, avoiding the kickout, or do you mean the > > raid system discovering the disk as faulty, and kicking it? :) > The process being check or repair as noted by mikylie who also responded to > this thread, see his response regarding check vs. repair. There is a > difference, with check/mdraid see mikylie's note, with RAID VERIFY on a 3ware > controller it will remap bad sectors to others parts of the array as it comes > across them both during RAID VERIFY and while the array is running live. > > Justin. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html