From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Max Waterman <davidmaxwaterman@fastmail.co.uk>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: upgrade advice
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:15:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1229436950.22331.45.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812160807200.725@p34.internal.lan>
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 08:07 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Redeeman wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 06:44 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Max Waterman wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have a 8x200GB RAID5 array - 4 SATA and 4 EIDE. It has 2 spare, so
> >>> that's only 6 drives actually in the array, making 1TB of space (I
> >>> think that's right).
> >>>
> >>> The drives are quite old now, and people are asking what I want for
> >>> Christmas...so I'm wondering how to upgrade this setup. Clearly I
> >>> don't want to retire my existing drives prematurely, since they've
> >>> shown no sign of problem.
> >>>
> >>> My initial thought was to make a RAID1 out of a new 1TB disk and my
> >>> existing RAID5 array, but perhaps that doesn't make much sense...
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps I could get a 400GB drive (or more likely 500GB) and make a
> >>> RAID1 with a couple of the existing 200GBs?
> >>>
> >>> ...but I'm just guessing and the purpose of this email is to get advice.
> >>>
> >>> What do you guys think?
> >>>
> >>> Max.
> >>
> >> Tough call, depends on what you want to accomplish? Availability or mass
> >> storage space? You could continue running like you are now and use a 1TiB
> >> disk as your "scratch" area and rsync the important data off to your
> >> RAID-5 nightly for example.
> >>
> >> Another option (probably not a good one) take two of your 200s and make a
> >> RAID1, leave your RAID-5 as-is, buy another 200GiB as a spare and then
> >> with the rest of the $ buy something else, there are no good alternatives,
> >> those are pretty old disks you got there, but I agree if its been running
> >> fine, no reason to replace it.
> > Hehe, i myself am in a somewhat similar position.. i have a 6x300gb
> > raid5 array.. And the disks appears perfectly fine through smart etc,
> > but on the other hand, a SINGLE new disk today can present me with the
> > same level of usable capacity very cheap, and ill bet using considerably
> > less power. Thus i have chosen to very soon retire this setup, and make
> > a replacement 8x1tb or 6x1.5tb raid6 for increased capacity and
> > safety :)
> >
> > i'd recommend you work towards deprecating LOTS of drives in favor of
> > fewer bigger newer, and keep the old ones around as an archive/backup
> > thing.
> Agree here, but the 1.5TiB are not enterprise disks, I would not recommend
> moving to them yet, but rather 1TiB, that is what I am currently doing,
> moving to WD RE3's (1TiB model).
I am somewhat scared of the seagate stuff too.. I however will probably
go the WD10EADS way instead, i know its not the "enterprise" disks, but
they are really lowpower, and well.. i would hope raid6 can bail me out
of any disk failures.
>
> Justin.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-16 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-16 11:10 upgrade advice Max Waterman
2008-12-16 11:44 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-16 11:49 ` Redeeman
2008-12-16 13:07 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-16 14:15 ` Redeeman [this message]
2008-12-16 15:57 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-16 16:10 ` Ryan Wagoner
2008-12-16 16:27 ` Redeeman
2008-12-16 23:29 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-17 0:08 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-17 6:59 ` Redeeman
2008-12-17 13:26 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-17 14:28 ` David Lethe
2008-12-17 14:37 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-17 15:30 ` David Lethe
2008-12-18 7:36 ` Redeeman
2008-12-18 16:37 ` John Robinson
2008-12-18 16:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-18 17:18 ` John Robinson
2008-12-18 19:14 ` upgrade advice / Disk drive failure rates - real world David Lethe
2008-12-18 22:51 ` Max Waterman
2008-12-19 4:28 ` David Lethe
2008-12-17 14:46 ` upgrade advice Redeeman
2008-12-17 15:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-01-13 3:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-01-13 4:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-12-16 13:09 ` Max Waterman
2008-12-16 13:04 ` Max Waterman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1229436950.22331.45.camel@localhost \
--to=redeeman@metanurb.dk \
--cc=davidmaxwaterman@fastmail.co.uk \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).