From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
To: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net>
Cc: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: upgrade advice
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:59:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1229497160.22331.73.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cccedfc60812161608y29e6c645n6ff7df5c87292374@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 18:08 -0600, Jon Nelson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Jon Nelson wrote:
> >
> >> What about Hitachi?
> >>
> >> Samsung has been my go-to drive for the better part of a decade, and
> >> Seagate hasn't won any favor with me, so I've been relying on Samsung
> >> and Hitachi with great results - so far.
>
> > Enterprise or 'desktop' disks Jon?
>
> Desktop. This is what I've got:
>
> Hitachi Deskstar T7K500 (HDT725032VLA360)
> SAMSUNG SpinPoint T166 series (HD321KJ)
> Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 family (ST3320620AS)*
> WDC WD3200AAKS-75VYA0
>
> * the seagate has the infamous 3.AAK firmware.
>
> I've almost always used Hitachi or Samsung, although I often
> "repurpose" drives from friends and I've had quite a few Maxtor and
> Seagate. The Hitachi does seem to run a bit hotter but it is probably
> my favorite drive of the bunch. The Samsung is nice and quiet,
> vibration-free, like the Hitachi and WD. The Seagate vibrates and is
> the second after the first died within the first few hours.
>
> If I were to buy replacement drives, I almost always look at Hitachi
> and Samsung first.
What sort of volume of disks are you using, and what loads? (24/7 with
high load?)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-17 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-16 11:10 upgrade advice Max Waterman
2008-12-16 11:44 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-16 11:49 ` Redeeman
2008-12-16 13:07 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-16 14:15 ` Redeeman
2008-12-16 15:57 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-16 16:10 ` Ryan Wagoner
2008-12-16 16:27 ` Redeeman
2008-12-16 23:29 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-17 0:08 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-17 6:59 ` Redeeman [this message]
2008-12-17 13:26 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-17 14:28 ` David Lethe
2008-12-17 14:37 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-17 15:30 ` David Lethe
2008-12-18 7:36 ` Redeeman
2008-12-18 16:37 ` John Robinson
2008-12-18 16:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-18 17:18 ` John Robinson
2008-12-18 19:14 ` upgrade advice / Disk drive failure rates - real world David Lethe
2008-12-18 22:51 ` Max Waterman
2008-12-19 4:28 ` David Lethe
2008-12-17 14:46 ` upgrade advice Redeeman
2008-12-17 15:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-01-13 3:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-01-13 4:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-12-16 13:09 ` Max Waterman
2008-12-16 13:04 ` Max Waterman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1229497160.22331.73.camel@localhost \
--to=redeeman@metanurb.dk \
--cc=jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).