From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
To: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WD GreenPower & Load_Cycle_Count
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:27:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1230197226.16617.17.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081223145334.GA17496@sewage.raw-sewage.fake>
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 08:53 -0600, Matt Garman wrote:
> A while ago I stumbled on a thread on the Linux kernel mailing list
> titled "Western Digital GreenPower drives and Linux". It's easy to
> find via google, or use this link[1].
>
> The gist is that if you look at the SMART attributes on these
> drives, chances are you'll see a really high Load_Cycle_Count. I do
> for my WD GP drives.
>
> I posted[2] on the ars technica forums a while back with the same
> topic. The suggestion in the last post was to use hdparm's
> spindown_time (-S) parameter to change the drive's behavior. I
> tried this, and it does in seem to keep that Load_Cycle_Count
> variable from increasing so quickly.
>
> But the original thread on LKML made it sound like the only way to
> solve the problem was with Western Digital's Windows-only
> "wdidle3.exe" utility.
It has also been suggested that on the RE2-GP drives there is a jumper
setting which stops it from happening. As to whether that actually works
or not, I do not know.
>
> Another question is this: does that Load_Cycle_Count SMART attribute
> really correspond to the number of head parks that have a specified
> ceiling (300k for consumer drives, 600k for enterprise/RE2)? Some
> of the threads I've read suggest that the SMART attribute talks
> about "soft" head parks (moving the head away from the platters),
> and WD's spec is for "hard" parks (where the head actually comes to
> rest, as in power down).
>
> Here's another interesting thread on the topic on silentpcreview[3].
>
> Anyway, I haven't been able to find a conclusive answer to this on
> the web. Just wondering if anyone on the list has any more info.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> [1] http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/505ccf760023d132/7e4f4e996f911efd
>
> [2] http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/24609792/m/481009715931?r=481009715931
>
> [3] http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=51401
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-25 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-23 14:53 WD GreenPower & Load_Cycle_Count Matt Garman
2008-12-23 15:49 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2008-12-23 19:14 ` David Rees
2008-12-24 4:52 ` Greg Freemyer
2008-12-25 9:27 ` Redeeman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1230197226.16617.17.camel@localhost \
--to=redeeman@metanurb.dk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.garman@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).