From: raz ben yehuda <raziebe@gmail.com>
To: linux raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Subject [ raid0 PATCH 3/6] : Add support to chunk size of 4K*n instead of 4K*2^n
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 02:05:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242687904.21201.13.camel@raz> (raw)
Add support to chunk size of 4K*n instead of 4K*2^n
raid0.c | 205 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 156 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: raziebe@gmail.com
--
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid0.c b/drivers/md/raid0.c
index 80ac685..dc2671f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid0.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid0.c
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
#include "md.h"
#include "raid0.h"
+static int handle_split(struct request_queue *q,
+ unsigned int chunk_sects, struct bio *bio);
+
static void raid0_unplug(struct request_queue *q)
{
mddev_t *mddev = q->queuedata;
@@ -263,7 +266,12 @@ static int raid0_mergeable_bvec(struct request_queue *q,
unsigned int chunk_sectors = mddev->chunk_size >> 9;
unsigned int bio_sectors = bvm->bi_size >> 9;
- max = (chunk_sectors - ((sector & (chunk_sectors - 1)) + bio_sectors)) << 9;
+ if (is_power_of_2(mddev->chunk_size))
+ max = (chunk_sectors - ((sector & (chunk_sectors-1))
+ + bio_sectors)) << 9;
+ else
+ max = (chunk_sectors - (sector_div(sector, chunk_sectors)
+ + bio_sectors)) << 9;
if (max < 0) max = 0; /* bio_add cannot handle a negative return */
if (max <= biovec->bv_len && bio_sectors == 0)
return biovec->bv_len;
@@ -356,15 +364,114 @@ static struct strip_zone *find_zone(struct raid0_private_data *conf,
BUG();
}
-static int raid0_make_request (struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
+static void position_bio_pow2(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio *bio)
{
- mddev_t *mddev = q->queuedata;
- unsigned int sect_in_chunk, chunksect_bits, chunk_sects;
+ sector_t sect_in_chunk;
+ mdk_rdev_t *tmp_dev;
+ unsigned int chunksect_bits;
+ sector_t chunk;
+ sector_t rsect;
+ sector_t x;
+
+ sector_t sector_offset = bio->bi_sector;
raid0_conf_t *conf = mddev->private;
- struct strip_zone *zone;
+ unsigned int chunk_sects = mddev->chunk_size >> 9;
+ struct strip_zone *zone = find_zone(conf, §or_offset);
+
+ chunksect_bits = ffz(~chunk_sects);
+ /* find the sector offset inside the chunk */
+ sect_in_chunk = bio->bi_sector & (chunk_sects - 1);
+ /* chunk in zone */
+ x = sector_offset >> chunksect_bits;
+ /* quotient is the chunk in real device*/
+ sector_div(x, zone->nb_dev);
+ chunk = x;
+ /*
+ * we treat the device list a two dimensional array.
+ * devices row + offset inside the devices row = real dev
+ */
+ x = bio->bi_sector >> chunksect_bits;
+ tmp_dev = conf->devlist[(zone - conf->strip_zone)*mddev->raid_disks
+ + sector_div(x, zone->nb_dev)];
+ /*
+ * position the bio over the real device
+ * real sector = chunk in device + starting of zone
+ + the position in the chunk
+ */
+ rsect = (chunk << chunksect_bits) + zone->dev_start + sect_in_chunk;
+ bio->bi_bdev = tmp_dev->bdev;
+ bio->bi_sector = rsect + tmp_dev->data_offset;
+}
+
+static void position_bio_notpow2(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ sector_t sect_in_chunk;
mdk_rdev_t *tmp_dev;
sector_t chunk;
- sector_t sector, rsect, sector_offset;
+ sector_t rsect;
+ sector_t x;
+
+ raid0_conf_t *conf = mddev->private;
+ sector_t chunk_sects = mddev->chunk_size >> 9;
+ sector_t sector_offset = bio->bi_sector;
+ struct strip_zone *zone = find_zone(conf, §or_offset);
+
+ /* find the sector offset inside the chunk */
+ x = bio->bi_sector;
+ sect_in_chunk = sector_div(x, chunk_sects);
+ /* find the chunk in the zone */
+ x = sector_offset;
+ sector_div(x, chunk_sects);
+ /* quotient is the chunk in the real device */
+ sector_div(x, zone->nb_dev);
+ chunk = x;
+ /* find the real device */
+ x = bio->bi_sector;
+ sector_div(x, chunk_sects);
+ tmp_dev = conf->devlist[(zone - conf->strip_zone)*mddev->raid_disks
+ + sector_div(x, zone->nb_dev)];
+ /*
+ * position the bio over the real device
+ * real sector = chunk in device + starting of zone
+ + the position in the chunk
+ */
+ rsect = (chunk * chunk_sects) + zone->dev_start + sect_in_chunk;
+ bio->bi_bdev = tmp_dev->bdev;
+ bio->bi_sector = rsect + tmp_dev->data_offset;
+}
+
+/*
+ * position the io to the real target device.
+ * for the sake of performance we maintain two flows, one for
+ * power2 chunk sizes and one non-power 2 chunk size.
+*/
+static void position_bio(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ if (is_power_of_2(mddev->chunk_size))
+ return (void)position_bio_pow2(mddev, bio);
+ position_bio_notpow2(mddev, bio);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Is io distribute over 1 or more chunks ?
+*/
+static inline int is_io_in_chunk_boundary(mddev_t *mddev,
+ unsigned int chunk_sects, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ if (is_power_of_2(mddev->chunk_size)) {
+ return !(chunk_sects < ((bio->bi_sector & (chunk_sects-1))
+ + (bio->bi_size >> 9)));
+ } else{
+ sector_t sector = bio->bi_sector;
+ return !(chunk_sects < (sector_div(sector, chunk_sects)
+ + (bio->bi_size >> 9)));
+ }
+}
+
+static int raid0_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ mddev_t *mddev = q->queuedata;
+ unsigned int chunk_sects;
const int rw = bio_data_dir(bio);
int cpu;
@@ -380,59 +487,59 @@ static int raid0_make_request (struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
part_stat_unlock();
chunk_sects = mddev->chunk_size >> 9;
- chunksect_bits = ffz(~chunk_sects);
- sector = bio->bi_sector;
-
- if (unlikely(chunk_sects < (bio->bi_sector & (chunk_sects - 1)) + (bio->bi_size >> 9))) {
- struct bio_pair *bp;
- /* Sanity check -- queue functions should prevent this happening */
- if (bio->bi_vcnt != 1 ||
- bio->bi_idx != 0)
- goto bad_map;
- /* This is a one page bio that upper layers
- * refuse to split for us, so we need to split it.
- */
- bp = bio_split(bio, chunk_sects - (bio->bi_sector & (chunk_sects - 1)));
- if (raid0_make_request(q, &bp->bio1))
- generic_make_request(&bp->bio1);
- if (raid0_make_request(q, &bp->bio2))
- generic_make_request(&bp->bio2);
-
- bio_pair_release(bp);
- return 0;
+ if (is_io_in_chunk_boundary(mddev, chunk_sects, bio)) {
+ position_bio(mddev, bio);
+ /* let upper layer do the actual io */
+ return 1;
}
- sector_offset = sector;
- zone = find_zone(conf, §or_offset);
- sect_in_chunk = bio->bi_sector & (chunk_sects - 1);
- {
- sector_t x = sector_offset >> chunksect_bits;
-
- sector_div(x, zone->nb_dev);
- chunk = x;
-
- x = sector >> chunksect_bits;
- tmp_dev = conf->devlist[(zone - conf->strip_zone)*mddev->raid_disks
- + sector_div(x, zone->nb_dev)];
- }
- rsect = (chunk << chunksect_bits) + zone->dev_start + sect_in_chunk;
-
- bio->bi_bdev = tmp_dev->bdev;
- bio->bi_sector = rsect + tmp_dev->data_offset;
-
/*
- * Let the main block layer submit the IO and resolve recursion:
- */
- return 1;
+ * io splits over two chunks at least
+ */
+ if (!handle_split(q, chunk_sects, bio))
+ /*
+ * handle split already made the ios
+ * report all ok and leave
+ */
+ return 0;
-bad_map:
printk("raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks"
" or bigger than %dk %llu %d\n", chunk_sects / 2,
(unsigned long long)bio->bi_sector, bio->bi_size >> 10);
-
bio_io_error(bio);
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * This io should be splitted to two ios.We split it,bounce it up,
+ * and each io will return to raid within the chunk boundaries
+*/
+static int handle_split(struct request_queue *q,
+ unsigned int chunk_sects, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ sector_t sector = bio->bi_sector;
+ struct bio_pair *bp;
+ mddev_t *mddev = q->queuedata;
+ /* Sanity check -- queue functions should prevent this happening */
+ if (bio->bi_vcnt != 1 || bio->bi_idx != 0)
+ return 1;
+ /* This is a one page bio that upper layers
+ * refuse to split for us, so we need to split it.
+ */
+ if (likely(is_power_of_2(mddev->chunk_size)))
+ bp = bio_split(bio, chunk_sects - (bio->bi_sector &
+ (chunk_sects-1)));
+ else
+ bp = bio_split(bio, chunk_sects -
+ sector_div(sector, chunk_sects));
+ if (raid0_make_request(q, &bp->bio1))
+ generic_make_request(&bp->bio1);
+ if (raid0_make_request(q, &bp->bio2))
+ generic_make_request(&bp->bio2);
+
+ bio_pair_release(bp);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void raid0_status(struct seq_file *seq, mddev_t *mddev)
{
#undef MD_DEBUG
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-18 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-18 23:05 raz ben yehuda [this message]
2009-05-19 0:36 ` Subject [ raid0 PATCH 3/6] : Add support to chunk size of 4K*n instead of 4K*2^n Neil Brown
2009-05-20 8:03 ` Andre Noll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1242687904.21201.13.camel@raz \
--to=raziebe@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).