From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
To: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
Cc: Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Poor write performance with write-intent bitmap?
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:00:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243033225.5740.30.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49EDB685.7000004@anonymous.org.uk>
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 13:05 +0100, John Robinson wrote:
> On 21/04/2009 06:50, Neil Brown wrote:
> > On Tuesday April 21, john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk wrote:
> >> Eeek! Trying to `mdadm --grow /dev/md1 --bitmap=none` from my large
> >> chunk size caused a reboot! There's nothing in the log, and I didn't see
> >> the console. I still have my 32M chunksize but I don't want to try that
> >> again in a hurry :-)
> >
> > That's a worry... I cannot easily reproduce it. If it happens again
> > and you get any more detail, I'm sure you'll let me know.
>
> Sure will. For the moment I have something that looks slightly
> inconsistent: mdadm --detail shows no bitmap after the crash:
> # mdadm --detail /dev/md1
> /dev/md1:
> Version : 00.90.03
> Creation Time : Mon Jul 28 15:49:09 2008
> Raid Level : raid5
> Array Size : 1953310720 (1862.82 GiB 2000.19 GB)
> Used Dev Size : 976655360 (931.41 GiB 1000.10 GB)
> Raid Devices : 3
> Total Devices : 3
> Preferred Minor : 1
> Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>
> Update Time : Tue Apr 21 12:37:15 2009
> State : clean
> Active Devices : 3
> Working Devices : 3
> Failed Devices : 0
> Spare Devices : 0
>
> Layout : left-symmetric
> Chunk Size : 256K
>
> UUID : d8c57a89:166ee722:23adec48:1574b5fc
> Events : 0.6152
>
> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
> 0 8 2 0 active sync /dev/sda2
> 1 8 18 1 active sync /dev/sdb2
> 2 8 34 2 active sync /dev/sdc2
>
> and indeed another attempt to remove the bitmap fails gently:
> # mdadm --grow /dev/md1 --bitmap none
> mdadm: no bitmap found on /dev/md1
>
> However examining any of the devices making up the RAID appears to
> suggest there is a bitmap:
> # mdadm --examine-bitmap /dev/sda2
> Filename : /dev/sda2
> Magic : 6d746962
> Version : 4
> UUID : d8c57a89:166ee722:23adec48:1574b5fc
> Events : 6148
> Events Cleared : 6148
> State : OK
> Chunksize : 32 MB
> Daemon : 5s flush period
> Write Mode : Normal
> Sync Size : 976655360 (931.41 GiB 1000.10 GB)
> Bitmap : 29806 bits (chunks), 10 dirty (0.0%)
>
> Is this to be expected? I would have thought it would say nothing here,
> or say there's no bitmap.
Hmm very good question, I'd like to know that aswell..
<snip>
> Many thanks for all your advice and assistance.
>
> Cheers,
>
> John.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-22 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-20 17:12 Performance of a software raid 5 Johannes Segitz
2009-04-20 23:46 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21 0:10 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 0:52 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21 1:05 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 1:12 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21 1:19 ` NeilBrown
2009-04-21 2:04 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 5:46 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-21 12:40 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-24 13:49 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-26 17:03 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 18:56 ` Corey Hickey
2009-04-22 12:29 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-04-22 22:32 ` Corey Hickey
2009-04-22 9:07 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-21 0:44 ` Poor write performance with write-intent bitmap? John Robinson
2009-04-21 1:33 ` NeilBrown
2009-04-21 2:13 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21 5:50 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-21 12:05 ` John Robinson
2009-05-22 23:00 ` Redeeman [this message]
2009-04-22 9:16 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-22 12:41 ` John Robinson
2009-04-22 14:02 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-23 7:48 ` John Robinson
2009-04-22 14:21 ` Andre Noll
2009-04-23 8:04 ` John Robinson
2009-04-23 20:23 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-21 16:00 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1243033225.5740.30.camel@localhost \
--to=redeeman@metanurb.dk \
--cc=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).