From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
To: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
Cc: SandeepKsinha <sandeepksinha@gmail.com>,
Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID5 reconstruction ?
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 18:08:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243699735.5740.103.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A213612.7080206@anonymous.org.uk>
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 14:35 +0100, John Robinson wrote:
> On 30/05/2009 06:44, SandeepKsinha wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Say If I have a RAID 5 array of 50GB of five disks of 10GB each.
> >
> > I have data of 5GB. When a disk fails and replaced with a spare disk.
> > Will the reconstruction happen only for the 5GB allocated disk blocks
> > or it will happen for the whole disk size.
>
> The whole disc size, for now anyway; md does not currently note which
> blocks have been used by its client (the filesystem, LVM, whatever).
>
> > Is it possible to make reconstruction intelligent enough to keep it optimized ?
>
> This has been discussed in combination with supporting SSD drives' TRIM
> function, and would mean md had to keep track of used chunks or possibly
> even sectors using a bitmap or something like that, but whether anyone's
> working on it I don't know.
I would say it should be possible to 'query' the filesystem for that
information. Obviously this will only work if you run a filesystem on it
which supports it, but it would seem like a nicer solution than a bitmap
for it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> John.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-30 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-30 5:44 RAID5 reconstruction ? SandeepKsinha
2009-05-30 12:52 ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-05-30 13:28 ` SandeepKsinha
2009-05-30 13:31 ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-06-09 4:13 ` Nifty Fedora Mitch
2009-05-30 13:35 ` John Robinson
2009-05-30 14:06 ` Maxime Boissonneault
2009-05-30 15:46 ` John Robinson
2009-05-30 16:16 ` Maxime Boissonneault
2009-05-30 16:30 ` John Robinson
2009-05-30 16:08 ` Redeeman [this message]
2009-05-30 18:39 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-05-30 18:54 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-31 8:10 ` SandeepKsinha
2009-05-30 18:55 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-30 19:37 ` Redeeman
2009-05-31 8:02 ` SandeepKsinha
2009-05-31 11:54 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-31 12:11 ` John Robinson
2009-05-31 12:14 ` NeilBrown
2009-06-03 1:54 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-06-02 18:42 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1243699735.5740.103.camel@localhost \
--to=redeeman@metanurb.dk \
--cc=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeepksinha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).