From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kasper Sandberg Subject: Re: RAID 5 rebuild fails with power interruption. Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:36:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1259026597.31633.129.camel@localhost> References: <8338BD137FF1B64EB341218BD702985E02AB8FCF@BLR-EC-MBX03.wipro.com> <87y6m759o2.fsf@frosties.localdomain> <8338BD137FF1B64EB341218BD702985E02AB90B8@BLR-EC-MBX03.wipro.com> <20091117094720.4c8736d7@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091117094720.4c8736d7@notabene.brown> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Neil Brown Cc: senthilkumar.muthukalai@wipro.com, goswin-v-b@web.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:47 +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:00:38 +0530 > wrote: > > > We face this problem in our NAS product where we handle RAID5. > > In the below mentioned scenario, when RAID5 is rebuilding after > > adding a disk, we reset the power. > > Ideally when the system comes up, the RAID5 should have accepted the > > disk but not in our case. > > We get the 'kicking the non-fresh disk from array' message with the > > boot message. > > In our RAID init script we run 'mdadm -- Examine -- scan', followed by > > 'mdadm --assemble'. > > Could you pls help me to understand why this disk is being thrown out? > > It is because the metadata being used (v0.90) does not have the ability > to record that a device is partially recoverred. It can only record > that a device is either a full member of the array, or is not a member > of the array. So until the recovery completes, the metadata only > records that the device is not a member of the array. So when you > restart, you find that the device is not a member of the array. > > > > What could be the solution? > > Use 1.x metadata. e.g. add > --metadata=1.1 > to your --create command. > 1.x metadata is able to record that a device is only partially > recovered. So when the array is restarted the device will be included > and recovery will continue. Might it be possible to upgrade metadata without having to recreate the array? > > NeilBrown