Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Erik Boettcher" <tehfoo@gmail.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 5 Recovery
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 13:13:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <125ed8800812281013t59a3dc8cte44091d262cb8905@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <125ed8800812281004o4d179064r735e46315481775a@mail.gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Boettcher <tehfoo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: Raid 5 Recovery
To: Dylan Distasio <interzone@gmail.com>


On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Erik Boettcher <tehfoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Dylan Distasio <interzone@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Have you tried assembling the array degraded to see if you can force
>> it without sdd3?  I don't know if this is the best solution, but if
>> that works, you can then readd sdd3 and have the array rebuild.
>
> I tried forcing the assembly without sdd3, and it complains about sde3!
>
> I find it interesting that before the first command sdc3 failed but
> now it's not the fault point....
>

I guess I should specify how it complains: the exact same error
message but sde3 instead.

mack ~ # mdadm -A --force --no-degraded /dev/md0 /dev/sd{a,b,c,e}3
mdadm: superblock on /dev/sde3 doesn't match others - assembly aborted

eek, and I tried with the first 3 hdds and got this:
mack ~ # mdadm -A --force --no-degraded /dev/md0 /dev/sd{a,b,c}3
mdadm: clearing FAULTY flag for device 2 in /dev/md0 for /dev/sdc3
mdadm: clearing FAULTY flag for device 1 in /dev/md0 for /dev/sdb3
mdadm: clearing FAULTY flag for device 0 in /dev/md0 for /dev/sda3
mdadm: failed to add /dev/sdb3 to /dev/md0: Invalid argument
mdadm: failed to add /dev/sda3 to /dev/md0: Invalid argument
mdadm: failed to add /dev/sdc3 to /dev/md0: Invalid argument
mdadm: /dev/md0 assembled from 0 drives (out of 5), but not started.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-28 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-28  6:21 Raid 5 Recovery Erik Boettcher
2008-12-28 15:33 ` Redeeman
2008-12-28 15:53 ` Dylan Distasio
     [not found]   ` <125ed8800812281002t6eecb5cbu2173efab36418c92@mail.gmail.com>
2008-12-28 18:12     ` Erik Boettcher
     [not found]     ` <125ed8800812281004o4d179064r735e46315481775a@mail.gmail.com>
2008-12-28 18:13       ` Erik Boettcher [this message]
2008-12-28 21:31         ` NeilBrown
     [not found]           ` <125ed8800812281359r3050d001g5936a65e2fa27d21@mail.gmail.com>
2008-12-28 23:53             ` Erik Boettcher
2008-12-30  5:23               ` Erik Boettcher
     [not found]         ` <20081228183921.GA5815@csy.ca>
2008-12-28 22:15           ` Justin Piszcz
2009-03-22  3:15             ` Erik Boettcher
2009-03-22  7:15               ` Max Amanshauser
2009-03-22  9:05                 ` Erik Boettcher
2009-03-22 16:49                   ` Erik Boettcher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=125ed8800812281013t59a3dc8cte44091d262cb8905@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tehfoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox