linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michał Sawicz" <michal@sawicz.net>
To: aragonx@dcsnow.com
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Several steps to death
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:12:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264529546.30742.95.camel@test.apertos.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4eae8d29d5e663323c7be0a31c8b6262.squirrel@www.dcsnow.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1180 bytes --]

Dnia 2010-01-26, wto o godzinie 12:48 -0500, aragonx@dcsnow.com pisze:
> My thinking this morning is to setup a 2nd server with the 5 750GB
> disks
> and leave that as a software RAID.  Then I would purchase 2 2TB disks
> for
> my current server and just use them as-is.

Remember that if you lose any of the 2TB disks, you lose all data on
that disk. With those 5 disks in a RAID5 array, you can safely replace
any of them, without losing any data.

> Throughput is a concern though.  I currently was getting 50MB/sec over
> the
> network.  This was okay but I really wanted to get that up to 75MB/sec
> or
> more.

From a RAID5 array (when reading) you should get more than from one,
even faster, disk. Remember that with a RAID5 data is read sequentially
from N-1 disks (where N is the number of disks in your array). Writing
can be a bit slower due to parity calculation that needs to occur.

I would stay with the software RAID setup, but it seems you should try
and read some more about it. Remember to use some monitoring tools like
smartd and mdadm --monitor that will shout at you when there are
problems.

-- 
Cheers
Michał (Saviq) Sawicz

[-- Attachment #2: To jest część wiadomości podpisana cyfrowo --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-26 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-25 21:21 Several steps to death aragonx
2010-01-26  1:35 ` Michael Evans
2010-01-26  9:28 ` Asdo
2010-01-26 13:17   ` aragonx
2010-01-26 13:36     ` Asdo
2010-01-26 14:36       ` aragonx
2010-01-26 14:56         ` Michał Sawicz
2010-01-26 15:07           ` Asdo
2010-01-26 17:48           ` aragonx
2010-01-26 18:12             ` Michał Sawicz [this message]
2010-01-26 14:45     ` Kristleifur Daðason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1264529546.30742.95.camel@test.apertos.eu \
    --to=michal@sawicz.net \
    --cc=aragonx@dcsnow.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).