From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Reurich Subject: Re: (boot time consequences of) Linux mdadm superblock question. Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:03:21 +1300 Message-ID: <1266465801.11568.183.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <201002140251.59668.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <20100217181016.GA14983@emergent.ellipticsemi.com> <201002171927.07051.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <20100217183703.GA15446@emergent.ellipticsemi.com> <20100218102407.49f73d67@notabene.brown> <20100218025809.GA20358@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20100218032610.GB1991@lapse.rw.madduck.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100218032610.GB1991@lapse.rw.madduck.net> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: martin f krafft Cc: linux-raid List-Id: linux-raid.ids > Debian experimental. But so far, I was unable to get rid of > mdadm.conf because it only works without the info in that file if > the homehost is correctly encoded in the metadata. So the challenge > I am facing is http://bugs.debian.org/567468. Why not use an installation generated uuid like that of the root filesystem for the homehost identifier. It's less likely to change then just about any other system identifier.