linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Ubuntu's ReliableRaid document
@ 2010-03-29  5:55 Jan Ceuleers
  2010-03-31 18:15 ` Jan Ceuleers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Ceuleers @ 2010-03-29  5:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

All,

Has anyone on this list seen/reviewed the Ubuntu document at

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReliableRaid

My concerns are the following (but I have to prefix them with the
admission that my knowledge is too limited to be sure whether my
concerns are valid):

- The document comes across as being dismissive of some of the
  mdadm auto-assembly functionality, although this may be
  specific to the way in which mdadm is/was being used in Ubuntu.

- Some of the solutions to the identified problems appear
  dangerous. Example: unclear policy with regard to HOMEHOST in
  the absence of an mdadm.conf file or continued support of the
  use cases HOMEHOST was intended for.
 
- Suggestion that a configuration file might still be needed in
  order to capture RAID dependencies (such as on lvm and crypt),
  and that this file might be auto-generated. The discussion then
  goes on to say how this would be done based on major/minor
  numbers, which I believe run the risk of not being stable
  across boots.

I really hope that my concerns are unfounded, and I'd feel a lot
better if I were told so on this list.

Thanks, Jan


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Ubuntu's ReliableRaid document
  2010-03-29  5:55 Ubuntu's ReliableRaid document Jan Ceuleers
@ 2010-03-31 18:15 ` Jan Ceuleers
  2010-03-31 18:38   ` Jools Wills
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Ceuleers @ 2010-03-31 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> I really hope that my concerns are unfounded, and I'd feel a lot
> better if I were told so on this list.

OK, I'll take the lack of discussion as the reassurance I was after.

Thanks, Jan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Ubuntu's ReliableRaid document
  2010-03-31 18:15 ` Jan Ceuleers
@ 2010-03-31 18:38   ` Jools Wills
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jools Wills @ 2010-03-31 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Ceuleers; +Cc: linux-raid

On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 20:15 +0200, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> > I really hope that my concerns are unfounded, and I'd feel a lot
> > better if I were told so on this list.
> 
> OK, I'll take the lack of discussion as the reassurance I was after.

Currently mdadm and raid stuff on ubuntu has a lot of problems. the
version of mdadm shipped with the upcoming version of lucid is also
around 18 month old.

Best REgards

Jools

Jools Wills
-- 
IT Consultant
Oxford Inspire - http://www.oxfordinspire.co.uk - be inspired
t: 01235 519446 m: 07966 577498
jools@oxfordinspire.co.uk


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-31 18:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-29  5:55 Ubuntu's ReliableRaid document Jan Ceuleers
2010-03-31 18:15 ` Jan Ceuleers
2010-03-31 18:38   ` Jools Wills

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).