From: Jools Wills <jools@oxfordinspire.co.uk>
To: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
Cc: Learner Study <learner.study@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Raid performance
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 22:28:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270416495.25890.3.camel@travelmate.workshop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <k2t5bdc1c8b1004041146uec5162b8x5c95bfda2153ebd@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 11:46 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Are you just trolling or something? Why are you asking about non-linux
> RAID on a Linux software RAID list?
Don't want to start any flame war, but I had no problem with the mail,
and it seemed a relevant question. After all, we need to compare against
other systems to remain on top right? to strive to be the best?
If platform A and B is doing XYZ in terms of raid, then it is surely up
for discussion. I think such attitudes like this make people think we
are fanatical, rather than educated developers trying to improve things.
Best Regards
Jools
Jools Wills
--
IT Consultant
Oxford Inspire - http://www.oxfordinspire.co.uk - be inspired
t: 01235 519446 m: 07966 577498
jools@oxfordinspire.co.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-04 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-31 19:42 Linux Raid performance Learner Study
2010-03-31 20:15 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 3:07 ` Learner Study
2010-04-02 9:58 ` Nicolae Mihalache
2010-04-02 17:58 ` Learner Study
2010-04-02 11:05 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 11:18 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 17:55 ` Learner Study
2010-04-02 21:14 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 21:37 ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 11:20 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-03 15:56 ` Learner Study
2010-04-04 1:58 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-03 0:10 ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 0:39 ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-03 1:00 ` John Robinson
2010-04-03 1:14 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03 1:32 ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-03 1:37 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03 3:06 ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 3:00 ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 19:27 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03 18:14 ` MRK
2010-04-03 19:56 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-04 15:00 ` MRK
2010-04-04 18:26 ` Learner Study
2010-04-04 18:46 ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-04 21:28 ` Jools Wills [this message]
2010-04-04 22:38 ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-05 10:07 ` Learner Study
2010-04-05 16:35 ` John Robinson
2010-04-04 22:24 ` Guy Watkins
2010-04-05 13:49 ` Drew
2010-04-04 23:24 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 11:20 ` MRK
2010-04-05 19:49 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 21:03 ` Drew
2010-04-05 22:20 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 23:49 ` Roger Heflin
2010-04-14 20:50 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1270416495.25890.3.camel@travelmate.workshop \
--to=jools@oxfordinspire.co.uk \
--cc=learner.study@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markknecht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox