linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jaxboe@fusionio.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 20/41] lguest: replace VIRTIO_F_BARRIER support with VIRTIO_F_FLUSH support
Date: Fri,  3 Sep 2010 12:29:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1283509796-1510-21-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283509796-1510-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

VIRTIO_F_BARRIER is deprecated.  Replace it with VIRTIO_F_FLUSH
support.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 Documentation/lguest/lguest.c |   29 +++++++++--------------------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/lguest/lguest.c b/Documentation/lguest/lguest.c
index 8a6a8c6..dc73bc5 100644
--- a/Documentation/lguest/lguest.c
+++ b/Documentation/lguest/lguest.c
@@ -1640,15 +1640,6 @@ static void blk_request(struct virtqueue *vq)
 	off = out->sector * 512;
 
 	/*
-	 * The block device implements "barriers", where the Guest indicates
-	 * that it wants all previous writes to occur before this write.  We
-	 * don't have a way of asking our kernel to do a barrier, so we just
-	 * synchronize all the data in the file.  Pretty poor, no?
-	 */
-	if (out->type & VIRTIO_BLK_T_BARRIER)
-		fdatasync(vblk->fd);
-
-	/*
 	 * In general the virtio block driver is allowed to try SCSI commands.
 	 * It'd be nice if we supported eject, for example, but we don't.
 	 */
@@ -1680,6 +1671,13 @@ static void blk_request(struct virtqueue *vq)
 			/* Die, bad Guest, die. */
 			errx(1, "Write past end %llu+%u", off, ret);
 		}
+
+		wlen = sizeof(*in);
+		*in = (ret >= 0 ? VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK : VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR);
+	} else if (out->type & VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH) {
+		/* Flush */
+		ret = fdatasync(vblk->fd);
+		verbose("FLUSH fdatasync: %i\n", ret);
 		wlen = sizeof(*in);
 		*in = (ret >= 0 ? VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK : VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR);
 	} else {
@@ -1703,15 +1701,6 @@ static void blk_request(struct virtqueue *vq)
 		}
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * OK, so we noted that it was pretty poor to use an fdatasync as a
-	 * barrier.  But Christoph Hellwig points out that we need a sync
-	 * *afterwards* as well: "Barriers specify no reordering to the front
-	 * or the back."  And Jens Axboe confirmed it, so here we are:
-	 */
-	if (out->type & VIRTIO_BLK_T_BARRIER)
-		fdatasync(vblk->fd);
-
 	/* Finished that request. */
 	add_used(vq, head, wlen);
 }
@@ -1736,8 +1725,8 @@ static void setup_block_file(const char *filename)
 	vblk->fd = open_or_die(filename, O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE);
 	vblk->len = lseek64(vblk->fd, 0, SEEK_END);
 
-	/* We support barriers. */
-	add_feature(dev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BARRIER);
+	/* We support FLUSH. */
+	add_feature(dev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH);
 
 	/* Tell Guest how many sectors this device has. */
 	conf.capacity = cpu_to_le64(vblk->len / 512);
-- 
1.7.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-03 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-03 10:29 [PATCHSET #upstream] block, fs: replace HARDBARRIER with FLUSH/FUA, take#2 Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 01/41] ide: remove unnecessary blk_queue_flushing() test in do_ide_request() Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 02/41] block/loop: queue ordered mode should be DRAIN_FLUSH Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 03/41] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 04/41] block: deprecate barrier and replace blk_queue_ordered() with blk_queue_flush() Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 05/41] block: remove spurious uses of REQ_HARDBARRIER Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 06/41] block: misc cleanups in barrier code Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 07/41] block: drop barrier ordering by queue draining Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 08/41] block: rename blk-barrier.c to blk-flush.c Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 09/41] block: rename barrier/ordered to flush Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 10/41] block: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA based interface for FLUSH/FUA requests Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 11/41] block: filter flush bio's in __generic_make_request() Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 12/41] block: simplify queue_next_fseq Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 13/41] block: initialize flush request with WRITE_FLUSH instead of REQ_FLUSH Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 14/41] block: kick queue after sequencing REQ_FLUSH/FUA Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 15/41] block: make sure FSEQ_DATA request has the same rq_disk as the original Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 16/41] block: update documentation for REQ_FLUSH / REQ_FUA Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 17/41] block: use REQ_FLUSH in blkdev_issue_flush() Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 18/41] block/loop: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 19/41] virtio_blk: drop REQ_HARDBARRIER support Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 21/41] md: implment REQ_FLUSH/FUA support Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 22/41] block: make __blk_rq_prep_clone() copy most command flags Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 23/41] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for bio-based dm Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 12:36   ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-06 11:14   ` [dm-devel] " Milan Broz
2010-09-07 21:17     ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-07 22:15       ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-07 23:49         ` [PATCH 42/41] dm: convey that all flushes are processed as empty Mike Snitzer
2010-09-08  0:00           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-08  2:04             ` [PATCH 42/41 v2] " Mike Snitzer
2010-09-08 16:09               ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-08 16:09               ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-10 18:25   ` [PATCH 23/41] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for bio-based dm Mikulas Patocka
2010-09-10 18:46     ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-10 19:05       ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-09-10 19:24         ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-10 20:06           ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-09-10 23:36             ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-11  1:46               ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-18 17:58                 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-09-18 20:42                   ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2010-09-11 12:19               ` Ric Wheeler
2010-09-13 19:01               ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 24/41] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for request-based dm Tejun Heo
2010-09-08  1:46   ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 25/41] dm: relax ordering of bio-based flush implementation Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 26/41] dm: fix locking context in queue_io() Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 27/41] block: pass gfp_mask and flags to sb_issue_discard Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 28/41] xfs: replace barriers with explicit flush / FUA usage Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 29/41] btrfs: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 30/41] gfs2: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 31/41] reiserfs: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 32/41] nilfs2: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 33/41] jbd: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 34/41] jbd2: Modify ASYNC_COMMIT code to not rely on queue draining on barrier Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 35/41] jbd2: replace barriers with explicit flush / FUA usage Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 36/41] ext4: do not send discards as barriers Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 37/41] fat: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 38/41] swap: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 39/41] block: remove the WRITE_BARRIER flag Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 40/41] block: remove the BLKDEV_IFL_BARRIER flag Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 41/41] block: remove the BH_Eopnotsupp flag Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 18:53 ` [PATCHSET #upstream] block, fs: replace HARDBARRIER with FLUSH/FUA, take#2 Jens Axboe
2010-09-08 16:12 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-10 10:19   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1283509796-1510-21-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).