From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Namhyung Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] md/raid10 changes Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:33:01 +0900 Message-ID: <1308108781.1341.15.camel@leonhard> References: <1308103324-2375-1-git-send-email-namhyung@gmail.com> <20110615130954.3e58a12c@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110615130954.3e58a12c@notabene.brown> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: NeilBrown Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids 2011-06-15 (=EC=88=98), 13:09 +1000, NeilBrown: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:01:59 +0900 Namhyung Kim = wrote: >=20 > > Hello Neil, > >=20 > > This is a resend of my previous raid10 patches. Some of them are re= vised > > according to your comments and some of them are not reviewed at all= =2E > > Please take a look. > >=20 > > Thanks. > >=20 > >=20 > > Namhyung Kim (5): > > md/raid10: optimize read_balance() for 'far offset' arrays > > md/raid10: get rid of duplicated conditional expression > > md/raid10: factor out common bio handling code > > md/raid10: share pages between read and write bio's during recove= ry > > md/raid10: spread read for subordinate r10bios during recovery > >=20 >=20 > Thanks. > I've reject the first and last as explained separately but the other= s look > good and I have added them to my tree. They will probably be submit= ted in > the next merge window. >=20 > Thanks, > NeilBrown >=20 Hi, Thanks for reviewing them. As I said before, I don't have any realistic test environment for those patches. They've just come from the code inspection, and I (wrongly) thought they would be somewhat helpful, sorry. :) --=20 Regards, Namhyung Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html