From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tyler J. Wagner" Subject: Re: advanced partition format, mdadm, and raw disks Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 05:28:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1309840130.2865.5.camel@baal> References: <1309796133.2766.63.camel@baal> <20110705103030.401066f6@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110705103030.401066f6@notabene.brown> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: NeilBrown Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 10:30 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > No "super" is mentioned here so it must be using 0.90 metadata. Ah. Damn that old Debian package. I'm concerned that this means the filesystem isn't aligned to the 4K sector, and is therefore less efficient. Is 0.90 metadata at the beginning or end of the disk? Is it a multiple of 4K in size? Regards, Tyler -- "I respect you too much to respect your ridiculous ideas." -- Johann Hari