From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Adamski Subject: Re: potentially lost largeish raid5 array.. Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:28:15 -0400 Message-ID: <1317079695.27455.1.camel@oxygen.netxsys.com> References: <201109221950.36910.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> <201109231022.59437.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> <4E7D152C.9080704@hardwarefreak.com> <201109231811.08061.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> <4E7DCA66.4000705@hardwarefreak.com> <4E7E079C.4020802@hardwarefreak.com> <4E7F3D24.5050300@hardwarefreak.com> <4E7FC042.7040109@hardwarefreak.com> <4E80D815.9080005@hardwarefreak.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4E80D815.9080005@hardwarefreak.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 14:52 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Coincidentally, recent versions of mkfs.xfs will read the mdadm > config > and build the filesystem correctly, automatically, on top of striped > md > raid arrays. If I have LVM on top of RAID6, will mkfs.xfs read the mdadm config?