From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kay Sievers Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Add --initrd argument to mdadm Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:50:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1327351849.6323.9.camel@mop> References: <1326797330-4488-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <1326797330-4488-3-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <20120122221758.412b18d4@notabene.brown> <4F1D358C.9070508@redhat.com> <4F1DBF6F.40209@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F1DBF6F.40209@redhat.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lennart Poettering Cc: Jes Sorensen , NeilBrown , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dledford@redhat.com, harald@redhat.com, mschmidt@redhat.com List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 21:13 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya, > > On 23.01.2012 11:25, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > >> I'm open to suggestions, but I'm not seeing --initrd as the best choice just > >> yet. > > > > I was trying to come up with a better name, and I think --preboot is the > > best I have seen so far. Other ideas I had were: > > --systemd-root > > --no-shutdown > > however I like --preboot better, so I will go with that, unless someone > > starts throwing things at me. > > I figure it's a bit of bike-shedding, but I'd like to ask you to stick > to --initramfs or so if possible, simply because we're interested to > reuse the same name for that switch for all storage daemons which need > this, and the spec currently suggests --initramfs, and I'd prefer to > avoid notifying all users of that change if we change it... Last time you and I decided to rename it to --initrd, so the document does not say --initramfs. Back to square one. :) Kay