From: Jim Kukunas <james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>
To: neilb@suse.de
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] lib/raid6: fix sparse warnings in recovery functions
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 21:54:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337835258-26903-1-git-send-email-james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Make the recovery functions static to fix the following sparse warnings:
lib/raid6/recov.c:25:6: warning: symbol 'raid6_2data_recov_intx1' was
not declared. Should it be static?
lib/raid6/recov.c:69:6: warning: symbol 'raid6_datap_recov_intx1' was
not declared. Should it be static?
lib/raid6/recov_ssse3.c:22:6: warning: symbol 'raid6_2data_recov_ssse3'
was not declared. Should it be static?
lib/raid6/recov_ssse3.c:197:6: warning: symbol 'raid6_datap_recov_ssse3'
was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Kukunas <james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>
---
lib/raid6/recov.c | 7 ++++---
lib/raid6/recov_ssse3.c | 7 ++++---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/raid6/recov.c b/lib/raid6/recov.c
index 1805a5c..a95bccb 100644
--- a/lib/raid6/recov.c
+++ b/lib/raid6/recov.c
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
#include <linux/raid/pq.h>
/* Recover two failed data blocks. */
-void raid6_2data_recov_intx1(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila, int failb,
- void **ptrs)
+static void raid6_2data_recov_intx1(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila,
+ int failb, void **ptrs)
{
u8 *p, *q, *dp, *dq;
u8 px, qx, db;
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ void raid6_2data_recov_intx1(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila, int failb,
}
/* Recover failure of one data block plus the P block */
-void raid6_datap_recov_intx1(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila, void **ptrs)
+static void raid6_datap_recov_intx1(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila,
+ void **ptrs)
{
u8 *p, *q, *dq;
const u8 *qmul; /* Q multiplier table */
diff --git a/lib/raid6/recov_ssse3.c b/lib/raid6/recov_ssse3.c
index b77266f..ecb0289 100644
--- a/lib/raid6/recov_ssse3.c
+++ b/lib/raid6/recov_ssse3.c
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ static int raid6_has_ssse3(void)
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SSSE3);
}
-void raid6_2data_recov_ssse3(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila, int failb,
- void **ptrs)
+static void raid6_2data_recov_ssse3(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila,
+ int failb, void **ptrs)
{
u8 *p, *q, *dp, *dq;
const u8 *pbmul; /* P multiplier table for B data */
@@ -194,7 +194,8 @@ void raid6_2data_recov_ssse3(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila, int failb,
}
-void raid6_datap_recov_ssse3(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila, void **ptrs)
+static void raid6_datap_recov_ssse3(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila,
+ void **ptrs)
{
u8 *p, *q, *dq;
const u8 *qmul; /* Q multiplier table */
--
1.7.8.6
next reply other threads:[~2012-05-24 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-24 4:54 Jim Kukunas [this message]
2012-05-24 5:15 ` [PATCH] lib/raid6: fix sparse warnings in recovery functions NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1337835258-26903-1-git-send-email-james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com \
--to=james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).