From: Ross Boylan <ross@biostat.ucsf.edu>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ross@biostat.ucsf.edu
Subject: mdadm --fail doesn't mark device as failed?
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:17:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353514677.5795.14.camel@corn.betterworld.us> (raw)
After I failed and removed a partition, mdadm --examine seems to show
that partition is fine.
Perhaps related to this, I failed a partition and when I rebooted it
came up as the sole member of its RAID array.
Is this behavior expected? Is there a way to make the failures more
convincing?
The drive sdb in the following excerpt does appear to be experiencing
hardware problems. However, the failed partition that became the md on
reboot was on a drive without any reported problems.
<terminal>
markov:/# date; mdadm --examine -v /dev/sdb1
Wed Nov 21 07:56:32 PST 2012
/dev/sdb1:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.90.00
UUID : 313d5489:7869305b:c4290e12:319afc54
Creation Time : Mon Dec 15 06:49:51 2008
Raid Level : raid1
Used Dev Size : 96256 (94.02 MiB 98.57 MB)
Array Size : 96256 (94.02 MiB 98.57 MB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 0
Update Time : Wed Nov 21 07:37:14 2012
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Checksum : e28ac7f6 - correct
Events : 1696
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
0 0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
1 1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
markov:/# mdadm --fail /dev/md1 /dev/sdb3
mdadm: set /dev/sdb3 faulty in /dev/md1
markov:/# mdadm --fail /dev/md0 /dev/sdb1
mdadm: set /dev/sdb1 faulty in /dev/md0
markov:/# mdadm --remove /dev/md0 /dev/sdb1
mdadm: hot removed /dev/sdb1
markov:/# mdadm --remove /dev/md1 /dev/sdb3
mdadm: hot removed /dev/sdb3
markov:/# date; mdadm --examine -v /dev/sdb3
Wed Nov 21 07:57:54 PST 2012
/dev/sdb3:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.90.00
UUID : b77027df:d6aa474a:c4290e12:319afc54
Creation Time : Mon Dec 15 06:50:18 2008
Raid Level : raid1
Used Dev Size : 730523648 (696.68 GiB 748.06 GB)
Array Size : 730523648 (696.68 GiB 748.06 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 1
Update Time : Wed Nov 21 07:56:44 2012
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Checksum : f322bc10 - correct
Events : 5067056
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 1 8 19 1 active sync /dev/sdb3
0 0 8 3 0 active sync /dev/sda3
1 1 8 19 1 active sync /dev/sdb3
markov:/# mdadm -Q /dev/md0
/dev/md0: 94.00MiB raid1 2 devices, 0 spares. Use mdadm --detail for more detail.
markov:/# date; mdadm --detail /dev/md0
Wed Nov 21 07:58:56 PST 2012
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.90
Creation Time : Mon Dec 15 06:49:51 2008
Raid Level : raid1
Array Size : 96256 (94.02 MiB 98.57 MB)
Used Dev Size : 96256 (94.02 MiB 98.57 MB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 1
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Wed Nov 21 07:57:35 2012
State : clean, degraded
Active Devices : 1
Working Devices : 1
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
UUID : 313d5489:7869305b:c4290e12:319afc54
Events : 0.1700
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
1 0 0 1 removed
markov:/# mdadm --grow /dev/md0 -n 1 --force
</terminal>
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-21 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-21 16:17 Ross Boylan [this message]
2012-11-21 16:53 ` mdadm --fail doesn't mark device as failed? Sebastian Riemer
2012-11-21 17:03 ` Ross Boylan
2012-11-21 17:10 ` Sebastian Riemer
2012-11-21 17:23 ` Ross Boylan
2012-11-21 17:47 ` Sebastian Riemer
2012-11-21 19:41 ` Ross Boylan
2012-11-22 9:43 ` Sebastian Riemer
2012-11-22 10:07 ` Sebastian Riemer
2012-11-24 0:29 ` Ross Boylan
2012-11-21 19:52 ` Ross Boylan
2012-11-22 4:42 ` NeilBrown
2012-11-22 4:40 ` NeilBrown
2012-11-23 23:58 ` Ross Boylan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1353514677.5795.14.camel@corn.betterworld.us \
--to=ross@biostat.ucsf.edu \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).