From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther_J=2E?= Niederwimmer Subject: Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:42:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1361158.MkTZ6QR6cp@techz> References: <4961154.0TR9MeFlIq@techz> <2627519.Y2VdWh5VBI@techz> <1BDFB79A-E375-47F2-8EDF-8F51D8774651@colorremedies.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1BDFB79A-E375-47F2-8EDF-8F51D8774651@colorremedies.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Hello Chris, Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2012, 11:34:12 schrieb Chris Murphy: > On Sep 20, 2012, at 5:05 AM, G=FCnther J. Niederwimmer wrote: > > this is "normal" I install "windows 7" first ;). but the problem wi= th the > > wrong GPT Table Message I have also on a Raid10 with "Intel Matrix > > Storage" > > and dmraid installation. >=20 > OK you didn't answer my question about what mdadm metadata version yo= ur md > RAID is using. If it's 1.0 instead of 1.2 that could be the culprit. > > The Question is, work parted correct with Raid GPT Table? Thank you for the answer. excuse ;). OK. I have=20 mdadm-3.2.5-3.7.1 parted 2.4.-24.2.2 on the computer. =20 > Could be a bug in parted 2.3, which is old. Try using parted 3.0. I will search ;) > Another question is, do you really think it's a good idea to be mixin= g > different RAID implementations on the same physical devices, which al= so > appear to contain boot volumes? My installing is, win7 on the Raid1 GPT EFI the Raid1 have Partitions, = 5 for=20 NTFS and one ext4 for the "/Home" Direktory My Linux is on a SSD, SSD is also GPT EFI formated. >=20 > I think one of your RAID implementations is stepping on the GPT secon= dary > header. I've seen this before in a BIOS "fakeraid" implementation. So= I > would look at all of your RAID implementations, make sure they're usi= ng the > latest versions. Yes, it is a Intel Matrix Storage System, the Board is a DX58SO2 with l= ast=20 Bios & Firmware for the "fakeraid" ;) my question is, win can work with no Problem on the "Fakeraid" and a G= PT=20 Table. Could it be, that the kernel or / and parted have a Problem with= the=20 GPT Table on a Raid1 or a Raid10 Fakeraid ? I have this Problem on all my three Systems (Intel), also on my Small 1= 9"=20 Intel Server. --=20 mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen / best Regards. G=FCnther J. Niederwimmer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html