From: John Rowe <J.M.Rowe@exeter.ac.uk>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Unusual RAID 1 recovery problem
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 18:31:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368207075.17201.49695.camel@amp> (raw)
Following a system reinstall (an upgrade from Scientific Linux 5.x to
to 6.x), I had a RAID1 array that I could start manually with:
> mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sda4 /dev/sdb4
but would not start automatically on reboot. SL is a RedHat clone and
all partitions were of type "fd".
The above command worked fine and I could see all my data, but every
time I rebooted the RAID1 array wasn't there.
Encouraged by the reassuring words of the mdadm man page:
--assume-clean
Tell mdadm that the array pre-existed and is known
to be clean. It can be useful when trying to recover from a
major failure as you can be sure that no data will be affected
unless you actually write to the array.
I tried:
> mdadm --create -l 1 -n 2 -assume-clean /dev/md0 /dev/sda4 /dev/sdb4
This worked, following the usual warning about how the partitions had
previously been part of an array. But now:
> mount -r /md0 /bob
refuses to do anything even if I try:
> mount -t ext2 -r /md0 /bob
I get an error message listing various possibilities such as "bad
superblock". dmesg tells me it can't find an ext2 file system
on /dev/md0
Clearly I had misunderstood the meaning of "you can be sure that no data
will be affected unless you actually write to the array" but I'm hoping
there is still a way of accessing this unaffected data.
Thanks.
John
next reply other threads:[~2013-05-10 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-10 17:31 John Rowe [this message]
2013-05-10 18:13 ` Unusual RAID 1 recovery problem Piergiorgio Sartor
2013-05-10 19:23 ` Tregaron Bayly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1368207075.17201.49695.camel@amp \
--to=j.m.rowe@exeter.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).