From: mwilck@arcor.de
To: neilb@suse.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mwilck@arcor.de
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] tests/10ddf-create-fail-rebuild: new unit test for DDF
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 23:18:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375219114-5626-11-git-send-email-mwilck@arcor.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F82D3B.6060104@arcor.de>
From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@arcor.de>
This test adds a new unit test similar to 009imsm-create-fail-rebuild.
With the previous patches, it actually succeeds on my system.
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@arcor.de>
---
tests/10ddf-create-fail-rebuild | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tests/10ddf-create-fail-rebuild
diff --git a/tests/10ddf-create-fail-rebuild b/tests/10ddf-create-fail-rebuild
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..525c24d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/10ddf-create-fail-rebuild
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+# sanity check array creation
+
+ddf_check_hold() {
+ if mdadm --remove $1 $2; then
+ echo "$2 removal from $1 should have been blocked" >&2
+ cat /proc/mdstat >&2
+ mdadm -E $2
+ exit 1
+ fi
+}
+
+ddf_check_removal() {
+ if ! mdadm --remove $1 $2 ; then
+ echo "$2 removal from $1 should have succeeded" >&2
+ cat /proc/mdstat >&2
+ mdadm -E $2
+ exit 1
+ fi
+}
+
+. tests/env-ddf-template
+
+num_disks=2
+mdadm -CR $container -e ddf -n $num_disks $dev8 $dev9
+ddf_check container $num_disks
+
+# RAID0 + RAID1
+size=9000
+level=0
+chunk=64
+offset=0
+layout=0
+mdadm -CR $member0 $dev8 $dev9 -n $num_disks -l $level -z $size -c $chunk
+ddf_check member $member0 $num_disks $level $size $((size*2)) $offset $chunk $layout
+testdev $member0 $num_disks $size $chunk
+
+offset=$(((size & ~(chunk - 1))))
+size=4000
+level=1
+chunk=0
+mdadm -CR $member1 $dev8 $dev9 -n $num_disks -l $level -z $size
+ddf_check member $member1 $num_disks $level $size $size $offset $chunk $layout
+testdev $member1 1 $size 1
+check wait
+
+mdadm -Ss
+
+# RAID10 + RAID5
+num_disks=4
+mdadm -CR $container -e ddf -n $num_disks $dev8 $dev9 $dev10 $dev11
+ddf_check container $num_disks
+
+size=9000
+level=10
+chunk=64
+offset=0
+layout=2
+mdadm -CR $member0 $dev8 $dev9 $dev10 $dev11 -n $num_disks -l $level -z $size -c $chunk
+ddf_check member $member0 $num_disks $level $size $((size*2)) $offset $chunk $layout
+testdev $member0 $((num_disks-2)) $size $chunk
+
+offset=$(((size & ~(chunk - 1))))
+size=4000
+level=5
+mdadm -CR $member1 $dev8 $dev9 $dev10 $dev11 -n $num_disks -l $level -z $size -c $chunk
+ddf_check member $member1 $num_disks $level $size $((size*3)) $offset $chunk $layout
+testdev $member1 $((num_disks-1)) $size $chunk
+check wait
+
+# FAIL / REBUILD
+ddf_check_hold $container $dev8
+mdadm --fail $member0 $dev8
+mdadm --wait-clean --scan
+ddf_check_removal $container $dev8
+mdadm --add $container $dev12
+check wait
+ddf_check_hold $container $dev12
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-30 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 20:58 Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices Martin Wilck
2013-07-29 6:55 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-29 20:39 ` Martin Wilck
2013-07-29 20:42 ` Martin Wilck
2013-07-30 0:42 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-30 21:16 ` Martin Wilck
2013-07-30 21:18 ` [PATCH 00/10] Two bug fixes and a lot of debug code mwilck
2013-07-31 3:10 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-30 21:18 ` [PATCH 01/10] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: bugfix for 62ff3c40 mwilck
2013-07-30 21:18 ` [PATCH 02/10] DDF: log disk status changes more nicely mwilck
2013-07-30 21:18 ` [PATCH 03/10] DDF: ddf_process_update: log offsets for conf changes mwilck
2013-07-30 21:18 ` [PATCH 04/10] DDF: load_ddf_header: more error logging mwilck
2013-07-30 21:18 ` [PATCH 05/10] DDF: ddf_set_disk: add some debug messages mwilck
2013-07-30 21:18 ` [PATCH 06/10] monitor: read_and_act: log status when called mwilck
2013-07-31 2:59 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-31 5:28 ` Martin Wilck
2013-07-30 21:18 ` [PATCH 07/10] mdmon: wait_and_act: fix debug message for SIGUSR1 mwilck
2013-07-30 21:18 ` [PATCH 08/10] mdmon: manage_member: debug messages for array state mwilck
2013-07-30 21:18 ` [PATCH 09/10] mdmon: manage_member: fix race condition during slow meta data writes mwilck
2013-07-30 21:18 ` mwilck [this message]
2013-07-31 5:36 ` [PATCH] tests/env-ddf-template: helper for new unit test mwilck
2013-07-31 6:49 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1375219114-5626-11-git-send-email-mwilck@arcor.de \
--to=mwilck@arcor.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).