* [PATCH 0/2] Fix mdadm --add for LSI fake RAID
@ 2013-09-24 17:18 mwilck
2013-09-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched mwilck
2013-09-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: be careful with workspace_lba mwilck
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: mwilck @ 2013-09-24 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neilb, linux-raid; +Cc: mwilck
These patches hopefully solve the problem reported by
Francis Moreau in the thread "mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non
fresh disk": A disk set failed and removed from a LSI DDF fake
RAID can't be re-added any more.
Martin Wilck (2):
DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched
DDF: add_to_super_ddf: be careful with workspace_lba
super-ddf.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched
2013-09-24 17:18 [PATCH 0/2] Fix mdadm --add for LSI fake RAID mwilck
@ 2013-09-24 17:18 ` mwilck
2013-09-24 18:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] *DO NOT APPLY* " Martin Wilck
2013-09-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: be careful with workspace_lba mwilck
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: mwilck @ 2013-09-24 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neilb, linux-raid; +Cc: mwilck
If the current DDF structure doesn't have a secondary header,
don't set it.
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@arcor.de>
---
super-ddf.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/super-ddf.c b/super-ddf.c
index 002b271..3e13ff0 100644
--- a/super-ddf.c
+++ b/super-ddf.c
@@ -2822,8 +2822,9 @@ static int add_to_super_ddf(struct supertype *st,
} while (0)
__calc_lba(dd, ddf->dlist, workspace_lba, 32);
__calc_lba(dd, ddf->dlist, primary_lba, 16);
- if (ddf->dlist == NULL ||
- be64_to_cpu(ddf->dlist->secondary_lba) != ~(__u64)0)
+ if (be64_to_cpu(ddf->active->secondary_lba) == ~(__u64)0)
+ dd->secondary_lba = ddf->active->secondary_lba;
+ else
__calc_lba(dd, ddf->dlist, secondary_lba, 32);
pde->config_size = dd->workspace_lba;
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: be careful with workspace_lba
2013-09-24 17:18 [PATCH 0/2] Fix mdadm --add for LSI fake RAID mwilck
2013-09-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched mwilck
@ 2013-09-24 17:18 ` mwilck
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: mwilck @ 2013-09-24 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neilb, linux-raid; +Cc: mwilck
Some vendor DDF structures interpret workspace_lba
very differently then us. Make a sanity check on the value
before using it for config_size.
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@arcor.de>
---
super-ddf.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/super-ddf.c b/super-ddf.c
index 3e13ff0..7711f96 100644
--- a/super-ddf.c
+++ b/super-ddf.c
@@ -2703,6 +2703,31 @@ static unsigned int find_unused_pde(const struct ddf_super *ddf)
return DDF_NOTFOUND;
}
+static void _set_config_size(struct phys_disk_entry *pde, const struct dl *dl)
+{
+ __u64 cfs, t;
+ cfs = min(dl->size - 32*1024*2ULL, be64_to_cpu(dl->primary_lba));
+ t = be64_to_cpu(dl->secondary_lba);
+ if (t != ~(__u64)0)
+ cfs = min(cfs, t);
+ /*
+ * Some vendor DDF structures interpret workspace_lba
+ * very differently then us. Make a sanity check on the value.
+ */
+ t = be64_to_cpu(dl->workspace_lba);
+ if (t < cfs) {
+ __u64 wsp = cfs - t;
+ if (wsp > 1024*1024*2ULL && wsp > dl->size / 16) {
+ pr_err("%s: %x:%x: workspace size 0x%llx too big, ignoring\n",
+ __func__, dl->major, dl->minor, wsp);
+ } else
+ cfs = t;
+ }
+ pde->config_size = cpu_to_be64(cfs);
+ dprintf("%s: %x:%x config_size %llx, DDF structure is %llx blocks\n",
+ __func__, dl->major, dl->minor, cfs, dl->size-cfs);
+}
+
/* add a device to a container, either while creating it or while
* expanding a pre-existing container
*/
@@ -2826,7 +2851,7 @@ static int add_to_super_ddf(struct supertype *st,
dd->secondary_lba = ddf->active->secondary_lba;
else
__calc_lba(dd, ddf->dlist, secondary_lba, 32);
- pde->config_size = dd->workspace_lba;
+ _set_config_size(pde, dd);
sprintf(pde->path, "%17.17s","Information: nil") ;
memset(pde->pad, 0xff, 6);
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] *DO NOT APPLY* DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched
2013-09-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched mwilck
@ 2013-09-24 18:13 ` Martin Wilck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Wilck @ 2013-09-24 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neilb; +Cc: linux-raid
Plesse *do not* apply this patch. The next one
([PATCH 2/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: be careful with workspace_lba) is
good though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-24 18:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-24 17:18 [PATCH 0/2] Fix mdadm --add for LSI fake RAID mwilck
2013-09-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched mwilck
2013-09-24 18:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] *DO NOT APPLY* " Martin Wilck
2013-09-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: be careful with workspace_lba mwilck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).