* [PATCH 1/2] mdadm: do not try to hold dlm lock in free_super1
@ 2015-12-16 17:54 Guoqing Jiang
2015-12-16 17:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] mdadm: improve the safeguard for change cluster raid's sb Guoqing Jiang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guoqing Jiang @ 2015-12-16 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neilb; +Cc: linux-raid, rgoldwyn
Since free_super1 actually doesn't change the sb, it
just free the addr space of sb. Also free_super1 is
called in lots of place within mdadm, so remove dlm
lock code since the func doesn't need the protection
and also reduce latency.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
---
super1.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
index 7a1156d..38362e4 100644
--- a/super1.c
+++ b/super1.c
@@ -2421,15 +2421,6 @@ static int write_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, enum bitmap_update update
static void free_super1(struct supertype *st)
{
- int rv, lockid;
- if (is_clustered(st)) {
- rv = cluster_get_dlmlock(st, &lockid);
- if (rv) {
- pr_err("Cannot get dlmlock in %s return %d\n", __func__, rv);
- cluster_release_dlmlock(st, lockid);
- return;
- }
- }
if (st->sb)
free(st->sb);
@@ -2441,8 +2432,6 @@ static void free_super1(struct supertype *st)
free(di);
}
st->sb = NULL;
- if (is_clustered(st))
- cluster_release_dlmlock(st, lockid);
}
#ifndef MDASSEMBLE
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] mdadm: improve the safeguard for change cluster raid's sb
2015-12-16 17:54 [PATCH 1/2] mdadm: do not try to hold dlm lock in free_super1 Guoqing Jiang
@ 2015-12-16 17:54 ` Guoqing Jiang
2015-12-16 22:53 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guoqing Jiang @ 2015-12-16 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neilb; +Cc: linux-raid, rgoldwyn
This commit does the following jobs:
1. rename is_clustered to dlm_funs_ready since it match the
function better.
2. st->cluster_name can't be use to identify the raid is a
clustered or not, we should check the bitmap's version to
perform the identification.
3. for cluster_get_dlmlock/cluster_release_dlmlock funcs, both
of them just need the lockid as parameter since the cluster
name can get by get_cluster_name().
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
---
mdadm.h | 6 +++---
super1.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
util.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mdadm.h b/mdadm.h
index aad0fa8..be5dc7f 100644
--- a/mdadm.h
+++ b/mdadm.h
@@ -1484,9 +1484,9 @@ struct dlm_hooks {
};
extern int get_cluster_name(char **name);
-extern int is_clustered(struct supertype *st);
-extern int cluster_get_dlmlock(struct supertype *st, int *lockid);
-extern int cluster_release_dlmlock(struct supertype *st, int lockid);
+extern int dlm_funs_ready(void);
+extern int cluster_get_dlmlock(int *lockid);
+extern int cluster_release_dlmlock(int lockid);
extern void set_dlm_hooks(void);
#define _ROUND_UP(val, base) (((val) + (base) - 1) & ~(base - 1))
diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
index 38362e4..c7ff634 100644
--- a/super1.c
+++ b/super1.c
@@ -1100,12 +1100,13 @@ static int update_super1(struct supertype *st, struct mdinfo *info,
int rv = 0;
int lockid;
struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb = st->sb;
+ bitmap_super_t *bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb) + MAX_SB_SIZE);
- if (is_clustered(st)) {
- rv = cluster_get_dlmlock(st, &lockid);
+ if (bms->version == BITMAP_MAJOR_CLUSTERED && dlm_funs_ready()) {
+ rv = cluster_get_dlmlock(&lockid);
if (rv) {
pr_err("Cannot get dlmlock in %s return %d\n", __func__, rv);
- cluster_release_dlmlock(st, lockid);
+ cluster_release_dlmlock(lockid);
return rv;
}
}
@@ -1368,8 +1369,8 @@ static int update_super1(struct supertype *st, struct mdinfo *info,
rv = -1;
sb->sb_csum = calc_sb_1_csum(sb);
- if (is_clustered(st))
- cluster_release_dlmlock(st, lockid);
+ if (bms->version == BITMAP_MAJOR_CLUSTERED && dlm_funs_ready())
+ cluster_release_dlmlock(lockid);
return rv;
}
@@ -1474,13 +1475,14 @@ static int add_to_super1(struct supertype *st, mdu_disk_info_t *dk,
struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb = st->sb;
__u16 *rp = sb->dev_roles + dk->number;
struct devinfo *di, **dip;
+ bitmap_super_t *bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb) + MAX_SB_SIZE);
int rv, lockid;
- if (is_clustered(st)) {
- rv = cluster_get_dlmlock(st, &lockid);
+ if (bms->version == BITMAP_MAJOR_CLUSTERED && dlm_funs_ready()) {
+ rv = cluster_get_dlmlock(&lockid);
if (rv) {
pr_err("Cannot get dlmlock in %s return %d\n", __func__, rv);
- cluster_release_dlmlock(st, lockid);
+ cluster_release_dlmlock(lockid);
return rv;
}
}
@@ -1513,8 +1515,8 @@ static int add_to_super1(struct supertype *st, mdu_disk_info_t *dk,
di->next = NULL;
*dip = di;
- if (is_clustered(st))
- cluster_release_dlmlock(st, lockid);
+ if (bms->version == BITMAP_MAJOR_CLUSTERED && dlm_funs_ready())
+ cluster_release_dlmlock(lockid);
return 0;
}
@@ -1529,13 +1531,14 @@ static int store_super1(struct supertype *st, int fd)
struct align_fd afd;
int sbsize;
unsigned long long dsize;
+ bitmap_super_t *bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb) + MAX_SB_SIZE);
int rv, lockid;
- if (is_clustered(st)) {
- rv = cluster_get_dlmlock(st, &lockid);
+ if (bms->version == BITMAP_MAJOR_CLUSTERED && dlm_funs_ready()) {
+ rv = cluster_get_dlmlock(&lockid);
if (rv) {
pr_err("Cannot get dlmlock in %s return %d\n", __func__, rv);
- cluster_release_dlmlock(st, lockid);
+ cluster_release_dlmlock(lockid);
return rv;
}
}
@@ -1599,8 +1602,8 @@ static int store_super1(struct supertype *st, int fd)
}
}
fsync(fd);
- if (is_clustered(st))
- cluster_release_dlmlock(st, lockid);
+ if (bms->version == BITMAP_MAJOR_CLUSTERED && dlm_funs_ready())
+ cluster_release_dlmlock(lockid);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/util.c b/util.c
index 8217e11..f1b0b95 100644
--- a/util.c
+++ b/util.c
@@ -92,13 +92,9 @@ struct dlm_lock_resource {
struct dlm_lksb lksb;
};
-int is_clustered(struct supertype *st)
+int dlm_funs_ready(void)
{
- /* is it a cluster md or not */
- if (is_dlm_hooks_ready && st->cluster_name)
- return 1;
- else
- return 0;
+ return is_dlm_hooks_ready ? 1 : 0;
}
/* Using poll(2) to wait for and dispatch ASTs */
@@ -128,17 +124,24 @@ static void dlm_ast(void *arg)
ast_called = 1;
}
+static char *cluster_name = NULL;
/* Create the lockspace, take bitmapXXX locks on all the bitmaps. */
-int cluster_get_dlmlock(struct supertype *st, int *lockid)
+int cluster_get_dlmlock(int *lockid)
{
int ret = -1;
char str[64];
int flags = LKF_NOQUEUE;
+ ret = get_cluster_name(&cluster_name);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("The md can't get cluster name\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
dlm_lock_res = xmalloc(sizeof(struct dlm_lock_resource));
- dlm_lock_res->ls = dlm_hooks->create_lockspace(st->cluster_name, O_RDWR);
+ dlm_lock_res->ls = dlm_hooks->create_lockspace(cluster_name, O_RDWR);
if (!dlm_lock_res->ls) {
- pr_err("%s failed to create lockspace\n", st->cluster_name);
+ pr_err("%s failed to create lockspace\n", cluster_name);
goto out;
}
@@ -146,7 +149,7 @@ int cluster_get_dlmlock(struct supertype *st, int *lockid)
if (flags & LKF_CONVERT)
dlm_lock_res->lksb.sb_lkid = *lockid;
- snprintf(str, 64, "bitmap%04d", st->nodes);
+ snprintf(str, 64, "bitmap%s", cluster_name);
/* if flags with LKF_CONVERT causes below return ENOENT which means
* "No such file or directory" */
ret = dlm_hooks->ls_lock(dlm_lock_res->ls, LKM_PWMODE, &dlm_lock_res->lksb,
@@ -171,10 +174,13 @@ out:
return ret;
}
-int cluster_release_dlmlock(struct supertype *st, int lockid)
+int cluster_release_dlmlock(int lockid)
{
int ret = -1;
+ if (!cluster_name)
+ return -1;
+
/* if flags with LKF_CONVERT causes below return EINVAL which means
* "Invalid argument" */
ret = dlm_hooks->ls_unlock(dlm_lock_res->ls, lockid, 0,
@@ -195,7 +201,7 @@ int cluster_release_dlmlock(struct supertype *st, int lockid)
goto out;
}
- ret = dlm_hooks->release_lockspace(st->cluster_name, dlm_lock_res->ls, 1);
+ ret = dlm_hooks->release_lockspace(cluster_name, dlm_lock_res->ls, 1);
if (ret) {
pr_err("error %d happened when release lockspace\n", errno);
/* XXX make sure the lockspace is released eventually */
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] mdadm: improve the safeguard for change cluster raid's sb
2015-12-16 17:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] mdadm: improve the safeguard for change cluster raid's sb Guoqing Jiang
@ 2015-12-16 22:53 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2015-12-16 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guoqing Jiang; +Cc: linux-raid, rgoldwyn
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 598 bytes --]
On Thu, Dec 17 2015, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> This commit does the following jobs:
>
> 1. rename is_clustered to dlm_funs_ready since it match the
> function better.
> 2. st->cluster_name can't be use to identify the raid is a
> clustered or not, we should check the bitmap's version to
> perform the identification.
> 3. for cluster_get_dlmlock/cluster_release_dlmlock funcs, both
> of them just need the lockid as parameter since the cluster
> name can get by get_cluster_name().
>
> Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
This and other patch applied, thanks.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-16 22:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-16 17:54 [PATCH 1/2] mdadm: do not try to hold dlm lock in free_super1 Guoqing Jiang
2015-12-16 17:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] mdadm: improve the safeguard for change cluster raid's sb Guoqing Jiang
2015-12-16 22:53 ` NeilBrown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).