From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"neilb@suse.com" <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"jmoyer@redhat.com" <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] badblocks: Add core badblock management code
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:13:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450822398.5616.21.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r3if2gij.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1940 bytes --]
On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 16:34 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05 2015, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 15:30 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > +ssize_t badblocks_store(struct badblocks *bb, const char *page,
> > > > size_t len,
> > > > + int unack)
> > > [...]
> > > > +int badblocks_init(struct badblocks *bb, int enable)
> > > > +{
> > > > + bb->count = 0;
> > > > + if (enable)
> > > > + bb->shift = 0;
> > > > + else
> > > > + bb->shift = -1;
> > > > + bb->page = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > >
> > > Why not __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL)? The problem with kmalloc of
> > > an
> > > exactly known page sized quantity is that the slab tracker for
> > > this
> > > requires two contiguous pages for each page because of the
> > > overhead.
> >
> > Cool, I didn't know about __get_free_page - I can fix this up too.
> >
>
> I was reminded of this just recently I thought I should clear up the
> misunderstanding.
>
> kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE) does *not* incur significant overhead and certainly
> does not require two contiguous free pages.
> If you "grep kmalloc-4096 /proc/slabinfo" you will note that both
> objperslab and pagesperslab are 1. So one page is used to store each
> 4096 byte allocation.
>
> To quote the email from Linus which reminded me about this
>
> > If you
> > want to allocate a page, and get a pointer, just use "kmalloc()".
> > Boom, done!
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/21/605
>
> There probably is a small CPU overhead from using kmalloc, but no
> memory
> overhead.
Thanks Neil.
I just read the rest of that thread - and I'm wondering if we should
change back to kzalloc here.
The one thing __get_free_page gets us is PAGE_SIZE-aligned memory. Do
you think that would be better for this use? (I can't think of any). If
not, I can send out a new version reverting back to kzalloc.
-Vishal
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-22 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 18:43 [PATCH v2 0/3] Badblock tracking for gendisks Vishal Verma
2015-11-25 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] badblocks: Add core badblock management code Vishal Verma
2015-12-04 23:30 ` James Bottomley
2015-12-04 23:58 ` Verma, Vishal L
2015-12-05 0:06 ` James Bottomley
2015-12-05 0:11 ` Verma, Vishal L
2015-12-08 21:03 ` NeilBrown
2015-12-08 21:08 ` Verma, Vishal L
2015-12-08 21:18 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-08 23:47 ` Verma, Vishal L
2015-12-22 5:34 ` NeilBrown
2015-12-22 22:13 ` Verma, Vishal L [this message]
2015-12-22 23:06 ` NeilBrown
2015-12-23 0:38 ` Verma, Vishal L
2015-11-25 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block: Add badblock management for gendisks Vishal Verma
2015-12-04 23:33 ` James Bottomley
2015-12-05 0:17 ` Verma, Vishal L
2015-11-25 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] md: convert to use the generic badblocks code Vishal Verma
2015-12-01 18:55 ` Shaohua Li
2015-12-01 19:52 ` Verma, Vishal L
2015-12-04 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Badblock tracking for gendisks Verma, Vishal L
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-08 2:52 Vishal Verma
2015-12-08 2:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] badblocks: Add core badblock management code Vishal Verma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1450822398.5616.21.camel@intel.com \
--to=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).