From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2] RAID1: Avoid unnecessary loop to decrease conf->nr_queued in raid1d()
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:19:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479305968-18473-1-git-send-email-colyli@suse.de> (raw)
commit ccfc7bf1f0 points out bios from conf->bio_end_io_list also
contribute to conf->nr_queued counter, that's right. But the fix
could be improved. The original fix replaces list_add() by a while()
loop to iterate every bio on conf->bio_end_io_list, and decrease
conf->nr_queued. If we look at the code several lines after, we may
find there is another while() loop to iterate every node from tmp
list which contains the original content of conf->bio_end_io_list.
Yes, we can decrease conf->nr_queued here, then we can avoid the
previous extra while() loop, which consumes more CPU cycles and hold
a spin lock longer time when conf->bio_end_io_list is not tiny.
This patch changes to decrease conf->nr_queued in loop of
while(!list_empty(&tmp)){}, it avoids an extra loop execution, and
avoids holding conf->device_lock for too long time.
By suggestion from Neil, in this version of the patch, I use
list_splice_init() interface to operate conf->bio_end_io_list.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/raid1.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-raid1/drivers/md/raid1.c
===================================================================
--- linux-raid1.orig/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ linux-raid1/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -2387,17 +2387,17 @@ static void raid1d(struct md_thread *thr
!test_bit(MD_CHANGE_PENDING, &mddev->flags)) {
LIST_HEAD(tmp);
spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
- if (!test_bit(MD_CHANGE_PENDING, &mddev->flags)) {
- while (!list_empty(&conf->bio_end_io_list)) {
- list_move(conf->bio_end_io_list.prev, &tmp);
- conf->nr_queued--;
- }
- }
+ if (!test_bit(MD_CHANGE_PENDING, &mddev->flags))
+ list_splice_init(&conf->bio_end_io_list, &tmp);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
+
while (!list_empty(&tmp)) {
r1_bio = list_first_entry(&tmp, struct r1bio,
retry_list);
list_del(&r1_bio->retry_list);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
+ conf->nr_queued--;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
if (mddev->degraded)
set_bit(R1BIO_Degraded, &r1_bio->state);
if (test_bit(R1BIO_WriteError, &r1_bio->state))
next reply other threads:[~2016-11-16 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-16 14:19 Coly Li [this message]
2016-11-16 14:36 ` [PATCH v2] RAID1: Avoid unnecessary loop to decrease conf->nr_queued in raid1d() Coly Li
2016-11-16 20:05 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-21 10:16 ` Coly Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1479305968-18473-1-git-send-email-colyli@suse.de \
--to=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).