Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "heming.zhao@suse.com" <heming.zhao@suse.com>
To: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: neilb@suse.com, guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com
Subject: Re: cluster-md mddev->in_sync & mddev->safemode_delay may have bug
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:52:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <149fa87e-2c77-ec44-af15-b0ffc996c3df@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zh80wa71.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>

Hello Neil,

Thank you for your comments, you gave me great help.
I will file new patches according to your comments.

On 7/16/20 8:54 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15 2020, heming.zhao@suse.com wrote:
> 
>> Hello List,
>>
>>
>> @Neil  @Guoqing,
>> Would you have time to take a look at this bug?
>>
>> This mail replaces previous mail: commit 480523feae581 may introduce a bug.
>> Previous mail has some unclear description, I sort out & resend in this mail.
>>
>> This bug was reported from a SUSE customer.
> 
> I think my answer would be that this is not a bug.
> 
> The "active" state is effectively a 1-bit bitmap of active regions of
> the array.   When there is no full bitmap, this can be useful.
> When this is a bit map, it is of limited use.  It is just a summary of
> the bitmap.  i.e. if all bits in the bitmap are clear, then the 'active'
> state can be clear.  If any bit is set, then the 'active' state must be
> set.
> 
> With a clustered array, there are multiple bitmaps which can be changed
> asynchronously by other nodes.  So reporting that the array not "active"
> is either unreliable or expensive.
> 
> Probably the best "fix" would be to change mdadm to not report the
> "active" flag if there is a bitmap.  Instead, examine the bitmaps
> directly and see if any bits are set.
> 
> So if MD_SB_CLEAN is set, report "clean".
> If not, examine all bitmaps and if they are all clean, report "clean"
> else report active (and optionally report % of bits set).
> 
> I would recommend against the kernel code change that you suggest.
> 
> For the safemode issue when converting to clustered bitmap, it would
> make sense for md_setup_cluster() to set ->safemode_delay to zero
> on success.  Similarly md_cluster_stop() could set it to the default
> value.
> 
> NeilBrown
> 
> 
>>
>> In cluster-md env, after below steps, "mdadm -D /dev/md0" shows "State: active" all the time.
>> ```
>> # mdadm -S --scan
>> # mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sd{a,b}
>> # mdadm -C /dev/md0 -b clustered -e 1.2 -n 2 -l mirror /dev/sda /dev/sdb
>>
>> # mdadm -D /dev/md0
>> /dev/md0:
>>              Version : 1.2
>>        Creation Time : Mon Jul  6 12:02:23 2020
>>           Raid Level : raid1
>>           Array Size : 64512 (63.00 MiB 66.06 MB)
>>        Used Dev Size : 64512 (63.00 MiB 66.06 MB)
>>         Raid Devices : 2
>>        Total Devices : 2
>>          Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>>
>>        Intent Bitmap : Internal
>>
>>          Update Time : Mon Jul  6 12:02:24 2020
>>                State : active <==== this line
>>       Active Devices : 2
>>      Working Devices : 2
>>       Failed Devices : 0
>>        Spare Devices : 0
>>
>> Consistency Policy : bitmap
>>
>>                 Name : lp-clustermd1:0  (local to host lp-clustermd1)
>>         Cluster Name : hacluster
>>                 UUID : 38ae5052:560c7d36:bb221e15:7437f460
>>               Events : 18
>>
>>       Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>>          0       8        0        0      active sync   /dev/sda
>>          1       8       16        1      active sync   /dev/sdb
>> ```
>>
>> with commit 480523feae581 (author: Neil Brown), the try_set_sync never true, so mddev->in_sync always 0.
>>
>> the simplest fix is bypass try_set_sync when array is clustered.
>> ```
>>    void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mddev)
>>    {
>>       ... ...
>>           if (mddev_is_clustered(mddev)) {
>>               struct md_rdev *rdev;
>>               /* kick the device if another node issued a
>>                * remove disk.
>>                */
>>               rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
>>                   if (test_and_clear_bit(ClusterRemove, &rdev->flags) &&
>>                           rdev->raid_disk < 0)
>>                       md_kick_rdev_from_array(rdev);
>>               }
>> +           try_set_sync = 1;
>>           }
>>       ... ...
>>    }
>> ```
>> this fix makes commit 480523feae581 doesn't work when clustered env.
>> I want to know what impact with above fix.
>> Or does there have other solution for this issue?
>>
>>
>> --------
>> And for mddev->safemode_delay issue
>>
>> There is also another bug when array change bitmap from internal to clustered.
>> the /sys/block/mdX/md/safe_mode_delay keep original value after changing bitmap type.
>> in safe_delay_store(), the code forbids setting mddev->safemode_delay when array is clustered.
>> So in cluster-md env, the expected safemode_delay value should be 0.
>>
>> reproduction steps:
>> ```
>> # mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sd{b,c,d}
>> # mdadm -C /dev/md0 -b internal -e 1.2 -n 2 -l mirror /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
>> # cat /sys/block/md0/md/safe_mode_delay
>> 0.204
>> # mdadm -G /dev/md0 -b none
>> # mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --bitmap=clustered
>> # cat /sys/block/md0/md/safe_mode_delay
>> 0.204  <== doesn't change, should ZERO for cluster-md
>> ```
>>
>> thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-16  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-15  3:48 cluster-md mddev->in_sync & mddev->safemode_delay may have bug heming.zhao
2020-07-15 18:17 ` Guoqing Jiang
2020-07-15 18:40   ` heming.zhao
2020-07-15 19:12     ` Guoqing Jiang
2020-07-16  0:54 ` NeilBrown
2020-07-16  5:52   ` heming.zhao [this message]
2020-07-16  6:10     ` Song Liu
2020-07-16  6:22       ` heming.zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=149fa87e-2c77-ec44-af15-b0ffc996c3df@suse.com \
    --to=heming.zhao@suse.com \
    --cc=guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox