From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: RE: RAID detection and activation w/o auto detection
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 16:31:08 +1000 (EST)
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <15567.35756.955569.701182@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au>
References: <4913AB320D31DC4798D6FEF5F557351F18240F@hawk.exanet-il.co.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: message from Yuval Yeret on Wednesday May 1
To: Yuval Yeret <yuval@exanet.com>
Cc: linux-raid maillist <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Wednesday May 1, yuval@exanet.com wrote:
> 
> 
> Should we consider mdadm as a replacement to raidstart/raidstop ? 

I certainly consider mdadm a replacement for raidstart/raidstop.

If you find it works well for you, you might like to do the same.

Or to put it another way:
 I am happy to provide software and advice on how to use it for free.
 I am not comfortable providing advice as to what is best for you to
   do for free.

NeilBrown