From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@suse.de>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>,
LinuxRaid RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] mdadm: move mdadm.map file into /dev/md
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:26:24 +1000 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <155bf3edda1c2692d316807ff5f58f30.squirrel@neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FF2073B4-6922-4D16-8FA7-90C66071C6F6@redhat.com>
On Tue, April 7, 2009 10:16 pm, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2009, at 2:05 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> Originally, mdadm used /var/run/mdadm/mdadm.map file to store the
>>> temporary mappings of incrementally added devices to device names.
>>> Unfortunately, this breaks incremental assembly if used early in the
>>> booting process. Specifically, root may still be read only. Since
>>> incremental assembly is largely a udev specific feature, and udev
>>> needs a writable /dev tmpfs mount even when root is still read only,
>>> it's safer to put our mdadm.map file in /dev/md so that we can write
>>> to the map file no matter how early in the boot process we are
>>> attempting to use incremental assembly.
>>
>> What about /lib/init/rw?
>
> Never heard of it. But, if / is read-only, why wouldn't that also be
> read-only?
because a tmpfs was mounted there. It's probably a Debian-specific
thing.
Why /var/run cannot be mounted from tmpfs nice and early too I don't know..
I understand that some people think /var/run needs to persist across
reboots to preserve ownership of directories, but they are wrong :-)
/var/run should be a tmpfs mount point very early.
I have to say that putting the map file in /dev feels very icky
to me. It isn't a device, and so doesn't belong in /dev.
If we go around putting things somewhere convenient rather than
where they belong, we quickly end up with a mess.
So while it might be very pragmatic, I am currently dis-inclined
to take the patch. Can you try asking your boot-script people
to make /var/run be an early tmpfs ???
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-07 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-06 14:52 [Patch] mdadm: move mdadm.map file into /dev/md Doug Ledford
2009-04-06 19:36 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-07 6:05 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-07 10:55 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-07 21:04 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-07 12:16 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-07 21:26 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2009-04-07 22:14 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-08 6:38 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-09 19:28 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-08 0:15 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-08 6:31 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-09 19:25 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-14 1:12 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=155bf3edda1c2692d316807ff5f58f30.squirrel@neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=goswin-v-b@web.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).