* Software RAID-5 safe under 2.6 kernel?
@ 2004-01-03 14:47 AndyLiebman
2004-01-03 15:11 ` Daniel Brahneborg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: AndyLiebman @ 2004-01-03 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Is there any "definitive word" about whether it's safe to use software RAID-5
under the released version of the 2.6 kernel? I have heard about various
problems on this list. Are they now resolved? Are there specific configurations to
watch out for? If anybody has this information, it might be nice to post it.
Andy Liebman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Software RAID-5 safe under 2.6 kernel?
2004-01-03 14:47 Software RAID-5 safe under 2.6 kernel? AndyLiebman
@ 2004-01-03 15:11 ` Daniel Brahneborg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Brahneborg @ 2004-01-03 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 09:47:57AM -0500, AndyLiebman@aol.com wrote:
> Is there any "definitive word" about whether it's safe to use software RAID-5
> under the released version of the 2.6 kernel? I have heard about various
> problems on this list. Are they now resolved? Are there specific configurations to
> watch out for? If anybody has this information, it might be nice to post it.
A definite word for the 2.4 kernel, especially when using SATA,
would also be welcome.
From my own experiences, the SATA chipsets from Silicon Image
and VIA has problems with both RAID1 and RAID5, even though
normal file systems work fine.
/Basic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-03 15:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-03 14:47 Software RAID-5 safe under 2.6 kernel? AndyLiebman
2004-01-03 15:11 ` Daniel Brahneborg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).