From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@gmail.com>
To: Paul Clements <paul.clements@steeleye.com>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:10:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <170fa0d20706141810x39cf0c48v645a8292f84a9eb7@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4671E5D3.6010903@steeleye.com>
On 6/14/07, Paul Clements <paul.clements@steeleye.com> wrote:
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > Here are the steps to reproduce reliably on SLES10 SP1:
> > 1) establish a raid1 mirror (md0) using one local member (sdc1) and
> > one remote member (nbd0)
> > 2) power off the remote machine, whereby severing nbd0's connection
> > 3) perform IO to the filesystem that is on the md0 device to enduce
> > the MD layer to mark the nbd device as "faulty"
> > 4) cat /proc/mdstat hangs, sysrq trace was collected
>
> That's working as designed. NBD works over TCP. You're going to have to
> wait for TCP to time out before an error occurs. Until then I/O will hang.
With kernel.org 2.6.15.7 (uni-processor) I've not seen NBD hang in the
kernel like I am with RHEL5 and SLES10. This hang (tcp timeout) is
indefinite oh RHEL5 and ~5min on SLES10.
Should/can I be playing with TCP timeout values? Why was this not a
concern with kernel.org 2.6.15.7; I was able to "feel" the nbd
connection break immediately; no MD superblock update hangs, no
longwinded (or indefinite) TCP timeout.
regards,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-15 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-13 2:30 raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5 Mike Snitzer
2007-06-13 2:42 ` Neil Brown
2007-06-13 2:59 ` Mike Snitzer
[not found] ` <170fa0d20706122009h5e3db54ek7487be4940a3d780@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <18031.25581.353761.802283@notabene.brown>
[not found] ` <170fa0d20706122130q2c77d365tbe9261bab1a5b1b@mail.gmail.com>
2007-06-13 18:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-06-13 23:30 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-06-14 21:05 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-14 21:57 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-06-15 0:40 ` Paul Clements
2007-06-15 1:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-06-15 1:05 ` Paul Clements
2007-06-15 1:10 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2007-06-15 1:16 ` Paul Clements
2007-06-15 1:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-06-15 13:21 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-15 1:00 ` Paul Clements
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=170fa0d20706141810x39cf0c48v645a8292f84a9eb7@mail.gmail.com \
--to=snitzer@gmail.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=paul.clements@steeleye.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).