From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: do not require mddev_lock() for all options
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:05:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175273eb-35a2-507d-ec0c-0685e7f6acd7@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW6qk=XbbOxtzr0FGVuZHLr4kbzODkTSPjcBmK4YYGWWKw@mail.gmail.com>
在 2023/09/23 5:04, Song Liu 写道:
> Hi Mariusz,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 1:55 AM Mariusz Tkaczyk
> <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> We don't need to lock device to reject not supported request
>> in array_state_store().
>> Main motivation is to make a room for action does not require lock yet,
>> like prepare to stop (see md_ioctl()).
>
> I made some changes to the commit log:
>
> md: do not require mddev_lock() for all options
>
> We don't need to lock device to reject not supported request
> in array_state_store().
> Main motivation is to make a room for action does not require lock yet,
> like prepare to stop (see md_ioctl()).
>
> But I am not sure what you meant by "make a room for action does not
> require lock yet". Could you please explain?
Yes, this sounds confusing, if 'action does not require lock', then it
shound not be blocked by array_state_store() with or without this patch.
>
> Otherwise, the code looks reasonable to me.
Changes look good to me, after clarify commit message, feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Song
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-25 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-13 8:55 [PATCH] md: do not require mddev_lock() for all options Mariusz Tkaczyk
2023-09-22 21:04 ` Song Liu
2023-09-25 3:05 ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2023-09-25 7:58 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=175273eb-35a2-507d-ec0c-0685e7f6acd7@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).