From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Add support for reshape of a raid6 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:39:56 +1100 Message-ID: <17885.636.133245.572876@notabene.brown> References: <20070220172544.15678.patches@notabene> <1070220063516.16208@suse.de> <20070221144806.e6eed85c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: message from Andrew Morton on Wednesday February 21 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Wednesday February 21, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100 > NeilBrown wrote: > > > + for (i = conf->raid_disks ; i-- ; ) { > > That statement should be dragged out, shot, stomped on then ceremonially > incinerated. An experiment in lateral thinking? I liked it, but there is no accounting for taste. > > What's wrong with doing > > for (i = 0; i < conf->raid_disks; i++) { > > in a manner which can be understood without alcoholic fortification? I guess... "Egoless programmer" and all that, "write for others to read, not for the compiler", and as you say it comes to the same number of bytes of code on common architectures. > > ho hum. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. NeilBrown