linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@rabbit.us>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid1 replaced with raid10?
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 14:15:26 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17982.42974.461499.127486@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Bill Davidsen on Friday May 4

On Friday May 4, davidsen@tmr.com wrote:
> Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I asked this question back in march but received no answers, so here it
> > goes again. Is it safe to replace raid1 with raid10 where the amount of
> > disks is equal to the amount of far/near/offset copies? I understand it
> > has the downside of not being a bit-by-bit mirror of a plain filesystem.
> > Are there any other caveats?
> >   
> Clearly you have reduced capacity, since there's a mirror AND a CRC, 
> otherwise I don't see any drawbacks. The performance should be much better.

CRC ??? md/raid10 doesn't have any CRC.
What CRC are you thinking of?

To answer the original question, I assume you mean "replace" as in
"backup, create new array, then restore".
You will get different performance characteristics.  Whether they
better suit your needs or not will depend largely on your needs.

NeilBrown

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-07  4:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-19 23:25 Raid1 replaced with raid10? Peter Rabbitson
2007-05-04 12:54 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-05-04 15:07   ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-07  4:15     ` Neil Brown [this message]
2007-05-07  6:49       ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-05-07  6:58         ` Neil Brown
2007-05-07  7:02           ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-05-07 21:22       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-07 21:29         ` Peter Rabbitson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17982.42974.461499.127486@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rabbit@rabbit.us \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).