From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Jeff Zheng <Jeff.Zheng@endace.com>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:45:22 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17995.49602.427417.500049@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Jeff Zheng on Thursday May 17
On Thursday May 17, Jeff.Zheng@endace.com wrote:
>
> > The only difference of any significance between the working
> > and non-working configurations is that in the non-working,
> > the component devices are larger than 2Gig, and hence have
> > sector offsets greater than 32 bits.
>
> Do u mean 2T here?, but in both configuartion, the component devices are
> larger than 2T (2.25T&5.5T).
Yes, I meant 2T, and yes, the components are always over 2T. So I'm
at a complete loss. The raid0 code follows the same paths and does
the same things and uses 64bit arithmetic where needed.
So I have no idea how there could be a difference between these two
cases.
I'm at a loss...
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-17 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <659F626D666070439A4A5965CD6EBF406836C6@gazelle.ad.endace.com>
2007-05-15 23:29 ` Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB Michal Piotrowski
2007-05-16 0:03 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-16 1:56 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-16 17:28 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-16 17:58 ` david
2007-05-17 0:48 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-17 2:09 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-17 2:45 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2007-05-17 3:11 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-17 4:32 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-17 5:08 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-17 4:45 ` david
2007-05-17 5:03 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-17 5:31 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-17 5:38 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-17 22:55 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-18 0:21 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-22 21:31 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17995.49602.427417.500049@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Jeff.Zheng@endace.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).