linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Michael Frotscher <infomails@tronserver.dyndns.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 08:12:14 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18056.9918.537787.152462@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Michael Frotscher on Sunday July 1

On Sunday July 1, infomails@tronserver.dyndns.org wrote:
> Hello RAID-Experts,
> 
> I have three RAID5 consisting of different partitions on 3 disks (Debian 
> stable) running the root-filesystem on a md (/boot is a separate non-raid 
> partition) which is running rather nicely. For convenience I plugged all 
> drives into the first ide controller making them hda, hdb and hdc. So far, so 
> good. The partitions are flagged "fd", i.e. Linux raid autodetect.
> 
> As I have another builtin-ide-controller onboard, I'd like to distribute the 
> disks for performance reasons, moving hdb to hde and hdc to hdg. The arrays 
> would then consist of drives hda, hde and hdg.
> 
> This should not be a problem, as the arrays should assemble themselves using 
> the superblocks on the partitions, shouldn't it? 
> 
> However, when I switch one drive (hdc), the array starts degraded with two 
> drives present because it is still looking for hdc, which of course now is 
> hdg. This shouldn't be happening. 
> 
> Well, then I re-added hdg to the degraded array, which went well and the array 
> rebuilded itself. I now had healthy arrays consisting of hda, hdb and hdg. 
> But after a reboot the array was degraded again and the system wanted its hdc 
> drive.
> 
> And yes, I edited /boot/grub/device.map and changed hdc to hdg, so that can't 
> be the reason.
> 
> I seem to be missing something here, but what is it?

Kernel logs from the boot would help here.
Maybe /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf lists "device=...." where it shouldn't.
Maybe the other IDE controller uses a module that it loaded late.
Logs would help.

NeilBrown
<

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-01 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-01 21:21 RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap Michael Frotscher
2007-07-01 22:12 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2007-07-02  6:35   ` Michael Frotscher
2007-07-02  6:50     ` Michael Frotscher
2007-07-03 17:16 ` Michael Frotscher
2007-07-03 17:22   ` Patrik Jonsson
2007-07-03 18:43   ` David Greaves
2007-07-03 19:20     ` Michael Frotscher
2007-07-03 19:29     ` Michael Frotscher
2007-07-04  8:45       ` David Greaves
2007-07-04 16:31         ` Michael Frotscher
2007-07-04 13:35       ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18056.9918.537787.152462@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=infomails@tronserver.dyndns.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).