From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH 0/2] stripe-queue for 2.6.23 consideration
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:10:02 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18084.21578.171810.48265@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Dan Williams on Sunday July 22
On Sunday July 22, dan.j.williams@intel.com wrote:
> Andrew, Neil,
>
> The stripe-queue patches are showing solid performance improvement.
>
> git://lost.foo-projects.org/~dwillia2/git/iop md-for-linus
>
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 1484 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> include/linux/raid/raid5.h | 87 +++-
> 2 files changed, 1164 insertions(+), 407 deletions(-)
>
> Dan Williams (2):
> raid5: add the stripe_queue object for tracking raid io requests (take2)
> raid5: use stripe_queues to prioritize the "most deserving" requests (take4)
>
> I initially considered them 2.6.24 material but after fixing the sync+io
> data corruption regression, fixing the large 'stripe_cache_size' values
> performance regression, and seeing how well it performed on my IA
> platform I would like them to be considered for 2.6.23. That being said
> I have not yet tested expand operations or raid6.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I think we really shouldn't aim for 2.6.23 at this stage. The merge
window is shut, and this is a little more that a bug fix. It's sounds
great though. I'd really like to hear more success reports, and will
do my own review a testing either this week or next.
Certainly good for -mm.
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-23 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-22 9:44 [GIT PATCH 0/2] stripe-queue for 2.6.23 consideration Dan Williams
2007-07-22 9:44 ` [GIT PATCH 1/2] raid5: add the stripe_queue object for tracking raid io requests (take2) Dan Williams
2007-07-22 9:45 ` [GIT PATCH 2/2] raid5: use stripe_queues to prioritize the "most deserving" requests (take4) Dan Williams
2007-07-23 7:10 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2007-07-23 21:43 ` [GIT PATCH 0/2] stripe-queue for 2.6.23 consideration Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18084.21578.171810.48265@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).