From: "John Stoffel" <john@stoffel.org>
To: Andrew Clayton <andrew@digital-domain.net>
Cc: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>,
David Rees <drees76@gmail.com>, Andrew Clayton <andrew@pccl.info>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID 5 performance issue.
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:02:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18182.35390.419883.646409@stoffel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071004154441.31addcfe@zeus.pccl.info>
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Clayton <andrew@digital-domain.net> writes:
Andrew> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:10:02 -0400 (EDT), Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> Also, did performance just go to crap one day or was it gradual?
Andrew> IIRC I just noticed one day that firefox and vim was
Andrew> stalling. That was back in February/March I think. At the time
Andrew> the server was running a 2.6.18 kernel, since then I've tried
Andrew> a few kernels in between that and currently 2.6.23-rc9
Andrew> Something seems to be periodically causing a lot of activity
Andrew> that max's out the stripe_cache for a few seconds (when I was
Andrew> trying to look with blktrace, it seemed pdflush was doing a
Andrew> lot of activity during this time).
Andrew> What I had noticed just recently was when I was the only one
Andrew> doing IO on the server (no NFS running and I was logged in at
Andrew> the console) even just patching the kernel was crawling to a
Andrew> halt.
How much memory does this system have? Have you checked the output of
/proc/mtrr at all? There' have been reports of systems with a bad
BIOS that gets the memory map wrong, causing access to memory to slow
down drastically.
So if you have 2gb of RAM, try booting with mem=1900m or something
like that and seeing if things are better for you.
Make sure your BIOS is upto the latest level as well.
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-05 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-03 9:53 RAID 5 performance issue Andrew Clayton
2007-10-03 16:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-03 16:48 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-03 20:10 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-03 20:16 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-06 12:30 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-06 16:05 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-03 20:19 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-03 20:35 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-03 20:46 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-03 20:36 ` David Rees
2007-10-03 20:48 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-04 14:08 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-04 14:09 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 14:10 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 14:44 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-04 16:20 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 18:26 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 10:25 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-05 10:57 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 11:08 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-05 12:53 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 13:18 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-05 13:30 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 14:07 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-05 14:32 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 16:10 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 16:16 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-05 19:33 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 18:58 ` Richard Scobie
2007-10-05 19:02 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-05 19:02 ` John Stoffel [this message]
2007-10-05 19:42 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 20:56 ` John Stoffel
2007-10-07 17:22 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-11 17:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-11 18:07 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-11 23:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 14:36 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-04 14:39 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 15:03 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-04 16:19 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 19:01 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-04 16:46 ` Steve Cousins
2007-10-04 17:06 ` Steve Cousins
2007-10-04 19:06 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 10:20 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 14:39 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-03 17:53 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2007-10-03 20:20 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-03 20:48 ` Richard Scobie
2007-10-05 20:25 ` Brendan Conoboy
2007-10-06 0:38 ` Dean S. Messing
2007-10-06 8:18 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-08 1:40 ` Dean S. Messing
2007-10-08 8:44 ` Justin Piszcz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18182.35390.419883.646409@stoffel.org \
--to=john@stoffel.org \
--cc=andrew@digital-domain.net \
--cc=andrew@pccl.info \
--cc=drees76@gmail.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).