Re: Time to deprecate old RAID formats?

[Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>]

On Monday October 29, dledford@redhat.com wrote:
> 
> The one thing I *do* like about mdadm -E above -D is it includes the
> superblock format in its output.  The one thing I don't like, is it
> almost universally gets the name wrong.  What I really want is a brief
> query format that both gives me the right name (-D) and the superblock
> format (-E).
> 


You need only ask:-)

Following patch will be in next release.  Thanks for the suggestion.

NeilBrown


### Diffstat output
 ./Detail.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff .prev/Detail.c ./Detail.c
--- .prev/Detail.c	2007-10-30 14:04:25.000000000 +1100
+++ ./Detail.c	2007-10-30 14:08:28.000000000 +1100
@@ -143,7 +143,10 @@ int Detail(char *dev, int brief, int exp
 	}
 
 	if (brief)
-		printf("ARRAY %s level=%s num-devices=%d", dev, c?c:"-unknown-",array.raid_disks );
+		printf("ARRAY %s level=%s metadata=%d.%d num-devices=%d", dev,
+		       c?c:"-unknown-",
+		       array.major_version, array.minor_version,
+		       array.raid_disks );
 	else {
 		mdu_bitmap_file_t bmf;
 		unsigned long long larray_size;