Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dag Nygren <dag@newtech.fi>
To: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>,
	yuji_touya@yokogawa-digital.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:05:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1829715.RaAbOq6Xvn@eseries.newtech.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <526A6235.2020801@turmel.org>

On Friday 25 October 2013 08:21:09 Phil Turmel wrote:
> Good morning Dag,
> 
> On 10/25/2013 03:27 AM, Dag Nygren wrote:
> 
> > Just enabling scterc (which is disabled by default and will be
> > after a power down of the drive), setting the timeout 
> > and then running a repair on the array
> > fixed it for me as md was smart enough to try to rewrite the
> > sector(s) that had failed and with scterc the drive would then reallocate
> > the failed sector. 
> > I thought I had this done, but a syntax error in the script had
> > prevented it from working.. :-( )
> > 
> > The working script I ran for this was:
> > =============================
> > # Set up RAID drive timeouts
> > for x in b c d e
> > do
> >         smartctl -l scterc,70,70 /dev/sd$x
> >         echo 180 >/sys/block/sd$x/device/timeout
> > done
> > ==============================
> 
> You shouldn't do both.  You only need the long driver timeout if the
> hard disk doesn't support scterc.  Long timeouts are bad for application
> software, as you can get very long system pauses while waiting for a
> sector recovery.  But the long timeout is the only option if you have
> non-scterc drives.

Ok, Just wanted to be on the safe side.. And this array is just serving
my MythTV recordings, so not very critical.

> Some time ago I posted a similar script that checked the result code
> from smartctl.  It only resets the driver timeout if smartctl couldn't
> set scterc.

This is of course even more optimal.

Thanks!
Dag

      reply	other threads:[~2013-10-25 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-24  5:10 Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed yuji_touya
2013-10-24  8:54 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-10-24 10:14   ` yuji_touya
2013-10-24 12:16     ` Phil Turmel
2013-10-25 10:47       ` yuji_touya
2013-10-25 12:07         ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-10-25 12:09         ` Phil Turmel
2013-10-24 12:44     ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-10-25  7:27       ` Dag Nygren
2013-10-25  8:24         ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-10-25  8:34           ` Dag Nygren
2013-10-25 10:08         ` yuji_touya
2013-10-25 12:21         ` Phil Turmel
2013-10-25 16:05           ` Dag Nygren [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1829715.RaAbOq6Xvn@eseries.newtech.fi \
    --to=dag@newtech.fi \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philip@turmel.org \
    --cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
    --cc=yuji_touya@yokogawa-digital.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox