linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Michael Guntsche <mike@it-loops.com>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Robin Hill <robin@robinhill.me.uk>
Subject: Re: Strange RAID-5 rebuild problem
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:33:36 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18379.18272.464486.925011@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Michael Guntsche on Sunday March 2

On Sunday March 2, mike@it-loops.com wrote:
> 
> So apparently it does switch to read-write on the first write  
> request, but the rebuild is not continuing.

Yes. 
This bug is fixed by the following patch which I have just sent of for
inclusion in mainline.
The patches talks about "reshape" but it applies to "resync" too.

The workaround is to "mdadm -w" before the first write.

Thanks,
NeilBrown


Make sure a reshape is started when device switches to read-write.

A resync/reshape/recovery thread will refuse to progress when the
array is marked read-only.  So whenever it mark it not read-only, it
is important to wake up thread resync thread.
There is one place we didn't do this.

The problem manifests if the start_ro module parameters is set, and a
raid5 array that is in the middle of a reshape (restripe) is started.
The array will initially be semi-read-only (meaning it acts like it is
readonly until the first write).  So the reshape will not proceed.

On the first write, the array will become read-write, but the reshape
will not be started, and there is no event which will ever restart
that thread.

Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>

### Diffstat output
 ./drivers/md/md.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff .prev/drivers/md/md.c ./drivers/md/md.c
--- .prev/drivers/md/md.c	2008-02-22 15:46:25.000000000 +1100
+++ ./drivers/md/md.c	2008-02-22 15:46:52.000000000 +1100
@@ -5356,6 +5356,7 @@ void md_write_start(mddev_t *mddev, stru
 		mddev->ro = 0;
 		set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
 		md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
+		md_wakeup_thread(mddev->sync_thread);
 	}
 	atomic_inc(&mddev->writes_pending);
 	if (mddev->in_sync) {

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-03  0:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-01 21:09 Strange RAID-5 rebuild problem Michael Guntsche
2008-03-01 22:02 ` Michael Guntsche
     [not found]   ` <20080301222326.GA20435@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk>
2008-03-01 22:41     ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-02  7:38       ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-02  8:14         ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-02 10:09           ` Michael Tokarev
2008-03-02 10:20             ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-03  0:33               ` Neil Brown [this message]
2008-03-03 12:38                 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-02 12:29           ` Robin Hill
2008-03-02 20:55             ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-03 17:53         ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18379.18272.464486.925011@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike@it-loops.com \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=robin@robinhill.me.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).