From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Michael Guntsche <mike@it-loops.com>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Robin Hill <robin@robinhill.me.uk>
Subject: Re: Strange RAID-5 rebuild problem
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:33:36 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18379.18272.464486.925011@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Michael Guntsche on Sunday March 2
On Sunday March 2, mike@it-loops.com wrote:
>
> So apparently it does switch to read-write on the first write
> request, but the rebuild is not continuing.
Yes.
This bug is fixed by the following patch which I have just sent of for
inclusion in mainline.
The patches talks about "reshape" but it applies to "resync" too.
The workaround is to "mdadm -w" before the first write.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Make sure a reshape is started when device switches to read-write.
A resync/reshape/recovery thread will refuse to progress when the
array is marked read-only. So whenever it mark it not read-only, it
is important to wake up thread resync thread.
There is one place we didn't do this.
The problem manifests if the start_ro module parameters is set, and a
raid5 array that is in the middle of a reshape (restripe) is started.
The array will initially be semi-read-only (meaning it acts like it is
readonly until the first write). So the reshape will not proceed.
On the first write, the array will become read-write, but the reshape
will not be started, and there is no event which will ever restart
that thread.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/md.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff .prev/drivers/md/md.c ./drivers/md/md.c
--- .prev/drivers/md/md.c 2008-02-22 15:46:25.000000000 +1100
+++ ./drivers/md/md.c 2008-02-22 15:46:52.000000000 +1100
@@ -5356,6 +5356,7 @@ void md_write_start(mddev_t *mddev, stru
mddev->ro = 0;
set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
+ md_wakeup_thread(mddev->sync_thread);
}
atomic_inc(&mddev->writes_pending);
if (mddev->in_sync) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-03 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-01 21:09 Strange RAID-5 rebuild problem Michael Guntsche
2008-03-01 22:02 ` Michael Guntsche
[not found] ` <20080301222326.GA20435@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk>
2008-03-01 22:41 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-02 7:38 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-02 8:14 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-02 10:09 ` Michael Tokarev
2008-03-02 10:20 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-03 0:33 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2008-03-03 12:38 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-02 12:29 ` Robin Hill
2008-03-02 20:55 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-03 17:53 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18379.18272.464486.925011@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike@it-loops.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=robin@robinhill.me.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).