From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: Enhancements and clean to linear RAID Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 21:38:29 +1000 Message-ID: <18962.39477.173613.395401@notabene.brown> References: <37d33d830905182323x22eec1c8l2a7471668c1a02b3@mail.gmail.com> <9a138833b29b54e5d6c1eaa188f27399.squirrel@neil.brown.name> <37d33d830905190031u5172af46kccb720343e359d99@mail.gmail.com> <37d33d830905190346g4147a114o5f4a53bf64c1ebac@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: message from SandeepKsinha on Tuesday May 19 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: SandeepKsinha Cc: Linux RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Tuesday May 19, sandeepksinha@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Neil, > > I have made all the required changes and have tested the changes. > It works fine. > > Thanks for enlightening me, the changes really optimized the code further. > > The patches will be followed by this mail. Thanks. I have applied them all (with very minor cleanups) and pushed them to my for-next tree. They can be viewed here: http://neil.brown.name/git?p=md;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-next I have taken the liberty of rewriting the introductory comments on the patches a little. I hope you don't mind. One important part of the patches that was missing was a "signed-off-by" line. Please read section 12 of Documentation/SubmittingPatches and then if you agree that the you an certify the Developer's Certificate of Origin on these patches, please write explicitly that I should add your Signed-off-by line to these patches. I have no doubt that the patches are suitably original, but the process requires that you explicitly tell me so. Thanks, NeilBrown