From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
Cc: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@gmail.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
raz ben yehuda <raziebe@013.net>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
Jacek Danecki <jacek.danecki@intel.com>,
"Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 21:51:27 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18971.55231.745810.961324@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Goswin von Brederlow on Tuesday May 26
On Tuesday May 26, goswin-v-b@web.de wrote:
> Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> writes:
>
> > On Monday May 25, goswin-v-b@web.de wrote:
> >> That really seems to scream for LVM to support more raid levels. It
> >> already has linear, raid0 and raid1 support (although I have no idea
> >> how device mapper raid1 compares to md raid1).
> >
> > Note that LVM (a suite of user-space tools) could conceivably use
> > md/raid1, md/raid5 etc. The functionality doesn't have to go in dm.
> >
> > Neil
>
> How would you do this? Worst case you can have a LV made up of totaly
> non linear PEs, meaning lots of 4MB (default PE size) big chunks in
> random order on random disks.
>
> Do you create a raid1/5 for each stripe? You surely run out of md
> devices.
We have 2^21 md devices easily (I think that is the number) and it
wouldn't be hard to have more if that were an issue.
>
> Create dm mappings for all stripe 0s, stripe 1s, stripe 2s, ... and
> then a raid1/5 over those stripe devices?
That might be an option.
>
> What if the LV has segments with different raid configurations (number
> of disks in a stripe or even different levels)? Create a raid for each
> segment and then a dm mapping for a linear raid?
>
Yes.
>
> You can get a flood of intermediate devices there. A /proc/mdstat with
> 200 entries would be horrible. iostat output would be totaly
> useless. ...
>
Yep, these would be interesting problems to solve. /proc/mdstat is a
bit of a wart on the design - getting the entry in /proc/mdstat
optional might be a good idea.
As for iostat - where does it get info from ? /proc/partitions? /proc/diskinfo?
Maybe /sys/block?
Either way, we could probably find a way to say "this block device is
'hidden'" .
If you want to be able to slice and dice lot of mini-raid arrays into
an LVM system, then whatever way you implement it you will need to be
keeping track of all those bits. I think it makes most sense to use
the "block device" as the common abstraction, then if we start finding
issues: solve them. That way the solutions become available for
others to use in ways we hadn't expected.
> MfG
> Goswin
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-26 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-02 21:46 Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape raz ben yehuda
2009-05-10 22:31 ` Neil Brown
2009-05-12 16:59 ` Raz
2009-05-19 18:09 ` Dan Williams
2009-05-19 22:27 ` Raz
2009-05-21 11:48 ` Neil Brown
2009-05-21 12:33 ` OT: busting a gut (was Re: Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape) John Robinson
2009-05-21 19:20 ` Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape Greg Freemyer
2009-05-25 12:19 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-25 20:06 ` Raz
2009-05-27 21:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-05-25 22:14 ` Neil Brown
2009-05-26 11:17 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-26 11:51 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2009-05-28 19:07 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-22 7:53 ` Dan Williams
2009-05-23 22:33 ` Raz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18971.55231.745810.961324@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Marcin.Labun@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=goswin-v-b@web.de \
--cc=greg.freemyer@gmail.com \
--cc=jacek.danecki@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raziebe@013.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).