Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Disk speed comparison
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:49:09 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19033157.9.1356198549636.JavaMail.root@zimbra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAMCDed=47sKjPBkP-MW=ZZoEuk6KXn6fQJj5hVdxpEdueLrHw@mail.gmail.com>

> > I have an array with 6 2TB drives plus a spare. While this works
> > well, I can from the munin graphs at
> > http://munin.karlsbakk.net/munin/karlsbakk.net/smilla.karlsbakk.net/index.html
> > that the WD2001FASS drives (sd[bcfg]) perform some 30% better than
> > the Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 drives (sd[eh]). The drives are on a
> > mixed set of controllers, so this shouldn't be relevant. Since they
> > all are specified to spin on 7200RPM, I find it wierd that the
> > performance difference shown by the Munin graph is so big.
> >
> > Anyone seen something similar?
> 
> Go the the manufacturers web sites and find the spec sheets for the
> drivers.
> 
> They will likely list a min speed and a max speed for how fast data is
> passing under the head depending on if it is the inner or outer track.
> 
> It basically comes down to if all is working exactly right, the number
> of bytes passing under the head times rpm, so if one disk has a higher
> bit density the rate will be larger, and this varies quite a bit from
> disk to disk.

Thanks for the replay

WD2001FASS: 4x500GB platters
HDS723020BLA642: 3x667GB platters

- Shouldn't higher density normally mean higher speed?

Vennlige hilsener / Best regards

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
roy@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med xenotyp etymologi. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-22 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-22 17:39 Disk speed comparison Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-22 17:44 ` Roger Heflin
2012-12-22 17:49   ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [this message]
2012-12-22 17:53     ` Roger Heflin
2012-12-22 18:07       ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-23  0:11         ` Roger Heflin
2012-12-23  4:59 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-12-23  5:29   ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-23 22:04     ` Stan Hoeppner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19033157.9.1356198549636.JavaMail.root@zimbra \
    --to=roy@karlsbakk.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox