From: AndyLiebman@aol.com
To: jlb17@duke.edu
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Software RAID-0 striping over Hardware RAID-5
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:51:09 EDT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1cd.2b876cdc.2e803a4d@aol.com> (raw)
jlb17@duke.edu writes:
> I have a couple of dual 3ware boxes I do this with, and have never had a
> problem. I would make sure that you have a hot spare on your RAID5
> arrays, though. Because if one of them dies, you'll obviously lose
> everything on both arrays.
Thanks for the reply, Joshua.
Have you ever tested your systems while one of your RAID5 arrays is
rebuilding or verifying? (I'm about to do that right now). I'm wondering if Linux
Software RAID-0 might falter if one of the two arrays is significantly slower than
the other (while rebuilding)?
To test the integrity of the system, I'm going to remove a drive from one of
the RAID5 arrays, add it back and rebuild the array, and while the rebuilding
is taking place I'm going to run Bonnie++ several times (100GB of
writing/reading per test).
My inclination is to not use a hot spare. Instead, I rely on 3ware's email
notification feature to alert me that a drive needs to be replaced. I always
keep a spare handy that can be popped into place immediately. Also, I want to
have control over when rebuilding takes place. It would be a bad thing to rebuild
during certain critical high I/O moments of the day -- whereas rebuilding at
night would be much less stressful on the system. Do you see anything wrong
with this approach?
Thanks again,
Andy
next reply other threads:[~2004-09-20 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-20 13:51 AndyLiebman [this message]
2004-09-20 17:13 ` Software RAID-0 striping over Hardware RAID-5 Guy
2004-09-23 0:23 ` Tim Moore
2004-09-23 0:27 ` Scott T. Smith
2004-09-23 12:34 ` Doug Ledford
[not found] <1a1.29d2b13e.2e8039e4@aol.com>
2004-09-20 13:55 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-17 22:03 AndyLiebman
2004-09-20 13:12 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1cd.2b876cdc.2e803a4d@aol.com \
--to=andyliebman@aol.com \
--cc=jlb17@duke.edu \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).