linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: AndyLiebman@aol.com
To: jlb17@duke.edu
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Software RAID-0 striping over Hardware RAID-5
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:51:09 EDT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1cd.2b876cdc.2e803a4d@aol.com> (raw)

jlb17@duke.edu writes:

> I have a couple of dual 3ware boxes I do this with, and have never had a 
> problem.  I would make sure that you have a hot spare on your RAID5 
> arrays, though.  Because if one of them dies, you'll obviously lose 
> everything on both arrays.

Thanks for the reply, Joshua. 

Have you ever tested your systems while one of your RAID5 arrays is 
rebuilding or verifying? (I'm about to do that right now). I'm wondering if Linux 
Software RAID-0 might falter if one of the two arrays is significantly slower than 
the other (while rebuilding)?

To test the integrity of the system, I'm going to remove a drive from one of 
the RAID5 arrays, add it back and rebuild the array, and while the rebuilding 
is taking place I'm going to run Bonnie++ several times (100GB of 
writing/reading per test). 

My inclination is to not use a hot spare. Instead, I rely on 3ware's email 
notification feature to alert me that a drive needs to be replaced. I always 
keep a spare handy that can be popped into place immediately. Also, I want to 
have control over when rebuilding takes place. It would be a bad thing to rebuild 
during certain critical high I/O moments of the day -- whereas rebuilding at 
night would be much less stressful on the system. Do you see anything wrong 
with this approach? 

Thanks again, 
Andy

             reply	other threads:[~2004-09-20 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-20 13:51 AndyLiebman [this message]
2004-09-20 17:13 ` Software RAID-0 striping over Hardware RAID-5 Guy
2004-09-23  0:23   ` Tim Moore
2004-09-23  0:27     ` Scott T. Smith
2004-09-23 12:34       ` Doug Ledford
     [not found] <1a1.29d2b13e.2e8039e4@aol.com>
2004-09-20 13:55 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-17 22:03 AndyLiebman
2004-09-20 13:12 ` Joshua Baker-LePain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1cd.2b876cdc.2e803a4d@aol.com \
    --to=andyliebman@aol.com \
    --cc=jlb17@duke.edu \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).